On Dec 7, 2019, at 11:37 AM, fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
>
> not sure to follow ...
> given that we need to construct a new Record, so you have to write all the
> components of the new record anyway.
One bit you’re missing is simple: If the old record already holds most of
the new record’s values,
- Mail original -
> De: "John Rose"
> À: "Brian Goetz"
> Cc: "Remi Forax" , "amber-spec-experts"
>
> Envoyé: Samedi 7 Décembre 2019 02:51:59
> Objet: Re: Record in C# 9 (proposal)
> On Dec 6, 2019, at 7:58 AM, Brian Goe
On Dec 6, 2019, at 7:58 AM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>
> Yes, we’ve been watching this one for years — they started on this effort
> shortly before we started on ours. Obviously they built a different feature
> because they have a different language; for example, records interact
> positively with
i Forax"
>> À: "amber-spec-experts"
>> Envoyé: Vendredi 6 Décembre 2019 12:05:13
>> Objet: Record in C# 9 (proposal)
>
>> Record from Vancouver :)
>> https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/master/proposals/recordsv2.md
>>
>> Rémi
oops, link to the wrong proposal
https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/master/proposals/records.md
Rémi
- Mail original -
> De: "Remi Forax"
> À: "amber-spec-experts"
> Envoyé: Vendredi 6 Décembre 2019 12:05:13
> Objet: Record in C# 9 (proposal)
&g
Record from Vancouver :)
https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/master/proposals/recordsv2.md
Rémi
