This is correct; I agree this is “not quite where we want to be yet”, but the
path to get there is not obvious, which is why we haven’t proposed anything
more than we have.
At some level (though this isn’t the whole story), the “null pattern” is in the
same limbo as constant patterns. Consta
Hi all,
i maybe wrong but it seems that the spec consider null as a kind of case
instead of as a kind of pattern, which disables the refactoring that should be
possible with the introduction of the record pattern.
Let suppose i have a sealed type with only one implementation declared like this
