Alex,
No I didn't. I don't know what happened to my email account.
Can you forward that comment to me again?
Regards,
Oak
From: Deucher, Alexander
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 3:20 PM
To: Zeng, Oak ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zeng, Oak
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Moved doorbel
On 2018-11-22 1:22 p.m., Liu, Shaoyun wrote:
> Driver shouldn't try to access any GFX registers until RLC is idle.
> During the test, it took 12 seconds for RLC to clear the BUSY bit
> in RLC_GPM_STAT register which is un-acceptable for driver.
> As per RLC engineer, it would take RLC Ucode less th
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 5:28 AM Kai Wasserbäch
wrote:
>
> [Please CC me on replies, I'm not subscribed to amd-gfx.]
>
> Hey,
> with the recent 4.19.x series of kernels I'm seeing several errors being
> logged
> during boot for my R9 290 (HAWAII PRO) GPU:
> > [ 50.057264] amdgpu: [powerplay] Fai
Did you see my other comments about consolidating vega10, raven, and vega12?
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
From: amd-gfx on behalf of Oak Zeng
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 3:01:23 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zeng, Oak
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:
Hi Alex,
This is a follow up patch to your previous comment on the doorbell patches.
Please review.
Regards,
Oak
-Original Message-
From: Zeng, Oak
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 3:01 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zeng, Oak
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Moved doorbell stru
Move doorbell structures, enum definitions and helper functions
from amdgpu.h to amdgpu_doorbell.h. No functional change
Change-Id: I09f7b84869b6d3c688b7a2506ff78d62b3de23f5
Signed-off-by: Oak Zeng
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 227 +---
drivers/gpu/drm/a
Hi Alex,
It is strange I didn't get your email on Wednesday. I will add one patch to
move all the doorbell definitions to a separate amdgpu_doorbell.h
Regards,
Oak
From: Deucher, Alexander
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 1:57 PM
To: Alex Deucher ; Zeng, Oak ; Koenig,
Christian
Cc: amd-gfx li
Please add a proper patch description.
Alex
From: amd-gfx on behalf of Zhu, Rex
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 4:44:31 AM
To: Liu, Monk; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: should break if already get the best size
Tested-by: Rex Zhu
Is this required? Are the harvesting fuses incorrect? If the blocks are
harvested, we should bail out of the blocks properly during init. Also, please
make this more explicit if we still need it. E.g.,
if ((adev->pdev->device == 0x67df) &&
(adev->pdev->revision == 0xf7))
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 1:13 PM Koenig, Christian
wrote:
> Am 23.11.18 um 18:36 schrieb Eric Anholt:
> > Christian König writes:
> >> Am 20.11.18 um 21:57 schrieb Eric Anholt:
> >>> Kenny Ho writes:
> Account for the number of command submitted to amdgpu by type on a per
> cgroup basi
The main idea is to be able to use different layouts on different asics that
may share the same IP code.
Alex
From: amd-gfx on behalf of Christian
K?nig
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 4:26:53 AM
To: Alex Deucher; Zeng, Oak
Cc: amd-gfx list
Subject: Re: [PA
Am 23.11.18 um 18:36 schrieb Eric Anholt:
> Christian König writes:
>
>> Am 20.11.18 um 21:57 schrieb Eric Anholt:
>>> Kenny Ho writes:
>>>
Account for the number of command submitted to amdgpu by type on a per
cgroup basis, for the purpose of profiling/monitoring applications.
>>> For
Am 23.11.18 um 15:10 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing):
>
> 在 2018/11/23 21:30, Koenig, Christian 写道:
>> Am 23.11.18 um 14:27 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing):
>>> 在 2018/11/22 19:25, Christian König 写道:
Am 22.11.18 um 07:56 schrieb Sharma, Deepak:
> when returned fence is not valid mostly due to
Christian König writes:
> Am 20.11.18 um 21:57 schrieb Eric Anholt:
>> Kenny Ho writes:
>>
>>> Account for the number of command submitted to amdgpu by type on a per
>>> cgroup basis, for the purpose of profiling/monitoring applications.
>> For profiling other drivers, I've used perf tracepoints
在 2018/11/23 21:30, Koenig, Christian 写道:
> Am 23.11.18 um 14:27 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing):
>> 在 2018/11/22 19:25, Christian König 写道:
>>> Am 22.11.18 um 07:56 schrieb Sharma, Deepak:
when returned fence is not valid mostly due to userspace ignored
previous error causes NULL pointer
在 2018/11/22 19:25, Christian König 写道:
> Am 22.11.18 um 07:56 schrieb Sharma, Deepak:
>> when returned fence is not valid mostly due to userspace ignored
>> previous error causes NULL pointer dereference.
>
> Again, this is clearly incorrect. The my other mails on the earlier
> patch.
Sorry for
Am 23.11.18 um 14:27 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing):
>
> 在 2018/11/22 19:25, Christian König 写道:
>> Am 22.11.18 um 07:56 schrieb Sharma, Deepak:
>>> when returned fence is not valid mostly due to userspace ignored
>>> previous error causes NULL pointer dereference.
>> Again, this is clearly incorrec
Am 23.11.18 um 11:32 schrieb Rex Zhu:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_csa.c:49 amdgpu_allocate_static_csa()
error: uninitialized symbol 'ptr'.
the test if (!bo) doesn't work, as the bo is a pointer to a pointer.
so need to check !*bo
Signed-off-by: Rex Zhu
Reviewed-by: Christian König
-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_csa.c:49 amdgpu_allocate_static_csa()
error: uninitialized symbol 'ptr'.
the test if (!bo) doesn't work, as the bo is a pointer to a pointer.
so need to check !*bo
Signed-off-by: Rex Zhu
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_csa.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 inse
[Please CC me on replies, I'm not subscribed to amd-gfx.]
Hey,
with the recent 4.19.x series of kernels I'm seeing several errors being logged
during boot for my R9 290 (HAWAII PRO) GPU:
> [ 50.057264] amdgpu: [powerplay] Failed to retrieve minimum clocks.
> [ 50.057266] amdgpu: [powerplay] Er
Tested-by: Rex Zhu
Without this patch, if we search node via rb tree.
For example: we insert different node with rand size, size range in
(1-).
the key in root node is 5587.
if we try to find the node with key equal to 5587 or 7381,
Loop:
node->key is 5587
node->key is 2273
nod
Hello SivapiriyanKumarasamy,
This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
The patch e1e8a020c6b8: "drm/amd/display: Add support for Freesync 2
HDR and Content to Display Mapping" from Sep 11, 2018, leads to the
following Smatch complaint:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../
Patch is Reviewed-by: Flora Cui
-Original Message-
From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of Junwei Zhang
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 4:32 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zhang, Jerry
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: disable UVD/VCE for some polaris 12 variants
Some variants don't support UV
Hello Rex Zhu,
The patch 1e256e276221: "drm/amdgpu: Refine CSA related functions"
from Oct 15, 2018, leads to the following static checker warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_csa.c:49 amdgpu_allocate_static_csa()
error: uninitialized symbol 'ptr'.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgp
please ignore this patch, there is typo in code.
On 11/23/18 4:01 PM, Junwei Zhang wrote:
Some variants don't support UVD and VCE.
Signed-off-by: Junwei Zhang
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c b/drive
Some variants don't support UVD and VCE.
Signed-off-by: Junwei Zhang
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c
index f3a4cf1f013a..3338b013ded4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amd
Remove gca/gfx_8_0_enum.h which is included more than once
Signed-off-by: Brajeswar Ghosh
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager_vi.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager_vi.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_dev
Remove drm/drm_fb_helper.h which is included more than once
Signed-off-by: Brajeswar Ghosh
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mode.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mode.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mode.h
index b9e9e8b02fb7..1cac
On 2018-10-22 1:23 p.m., Arun KS wrote:
> Remove managed_page_count_lock spinlock and instead use atomic
> variables.
>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko
> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka
> Signed-off-by: Arun KS
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling
Regards,
Felix
>
> ---
> As discussed here,
> https://patch
Remove dce/dce_mem_input.h which is included more than once
Signed-off-by: Brajeswar Ghosh
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce80/dce80_resource.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce80/dce80_resource.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce80/dc
Some variants don't support UVD and VCE.
Signed-off-by: Junwei Zhang
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c
index f3a4cf1f013a..46a92eca831b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/am
31 matches
Mail list logo
