On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 04:26:32PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:02:35PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:43:20PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > > +static int zero;
> > > +static int one = 1;
> >
> > !!!
> >
> > And these can't even be
Hi Russell,
This patch will read vbios, and parse vbios to get the baco reset feature
bit. From the call trace, it shows error in " amdgpu_get_bios ", but this
patch don't modify amdgpu_get_bios, and code before amdgpu_get_bios. Please
first check why it will has error when read vbios.
From: Sean Paul
I missed amdgpu in my connnector_helper_funcs->atomic_check conversion,
which is understandably causing compilation failures.
Fixes: 6f3b62781bbd ("drm: Convert connector_helper_funcs->atomic_check to
accept drm_atomic_state")
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Ville Syrjälä
Cc: Jani
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 2:42 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Hi Alex.
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:35:26PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:34 PM Hariprasad Kelam
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > this patch fixes below compilation error
> > >
> > >
Hi Alex.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:35:26PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:34 PM Hariprasad Kelam
> wrote:
> >
> > this patch fixes below compilation error
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c: In
> > function
Am 13.06.19 um 18:37 schrieb Kuehling, Felix:
> [SNIP]
There is
an issue found by KFDTest.BigBufStressTest, it allocates buffers up to
3/8 of total 256GB system memory, each buffer size is 128MB, then use
queue to write to the buffers. If ttm_mem_global_alloc_page get page pfn
On 2019-06-13 8:59, Yang, Philip wrote:
> On 2019-06-13 4:54 a.m., Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Am 12.06.19 um 23:13 schrieb Yang, Philip:
>>> On 2019-06-12 3:28 p.m., Christian König wrote:
Am 12.06.19 um 17:13 schrieb Yang, Philip:
> TTM create two zones, kernel zone and dma32 zone for
On 13/06/2019 16:57, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 04:45:54PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
>> On 13/06/2019 16:35, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:16:59PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:43:20PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 04:45:54PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> On 13/06/2019 16:35, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:16:59PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:43:20PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> >>> +
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Control the relaxed
On 2019-06-13 4:54 a.m., Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 12.06.19 um 23:13 schrieb Yang, Philip:
>> On 2019-06-12 3:28 p.m., Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 12.06.19 um 17:13 schrieb Yang, Philip:
TTM create two zones, kernel zone and dma32 zone for system memory. If
system memory address
On 13/06/2019 16:35, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:16:59PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:43:20PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>>> From: Catalin Marinas
>>>
>>> It is not desirable to relax the ABI to allow tagged user addresses into
>>> the
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:16:59PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:43:20PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > From: Catalin Marinas
> >
> > It is not desirable to relax the ABI to allow tagged user addresses into
> > the kernel indiscriminately. This patch introduces a
Hi Dave,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:02:35PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:43:20PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Global sysctl to disable the tagged user addresses support. This control
> > + * only prevents the tagged address ABI enabling via prctl()
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 7:56 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> never do something different based on this.
>
> Cc: Alex Deucher
> Cc: "Christian König"
>
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 4:22 PM Yrjan Skrimstad wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 02:08:21AM +0200, Yrjan Skrimstad wrote:
> > This driver currently contains a repeated 500ms blocking delay call
> > which causes frequent major buffer underruns in PulseAudio. This patch
> > fixes this issue by
On 6/13/19 9:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> never do something different based on this.
>
> Cc: Harry Wentland
> Cc: Leo Li
> Cc: Alex Deucher
> Cc:
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
never do something different based on this.
Cc: Oded Gabbay
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou"
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:43:20PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> From: Catalin Marinas
>
> It is not desirable to relax the ABI to allow tagged user addresses into
> the kernel indiscriminately. This patch introduces a prctl() interface
> for enabling or disabling the tagged ABI with a global
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
never do something different based on this.
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou"
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc:
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
never do something different based on this.
Cc: Harry Wentland
Cc: Leo Li
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou"
Cc: David
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:43:20PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> From: Catalin Marinas
>
> It is not desirable to relax the ABI to allow tagged user addresses into
> the kernel indiscriminately. This patch introduces a prctl() interface
> for enabling or disabling the tagged ABI with a global
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
never do something different based on this.
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: "Christian König"
Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou"
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc:
Hi Emily,
This patch caused a regression on MI25 (Chip 6860, VBIOS 113-D0513700-001)
machines where the driver would not boot. Note that this was not seen on Vega10
Frontier (Chip 6863, VBIOS 113-D0501100-X09) or Radeon64 (Chip 697f). Reverting
this patch resolved the issue with no other work
> -Original Message-
> From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of Paul
> Menzel
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 6:32 PM
> To: Alex Deucher
> Cc: Deucher, Alexander ; Sibren Vasse
> ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: return 0 by default in
> amdgpu_pm_load_smu_firmware
>
Dear Alex,
On 06/11/19 16:51, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Fixes SI cards running on amdgpu.
Shouldn’t the caller be updated to check for the error code?
Wouldn’t that be more explicit?
else if (!strcmp(chip_name, "raven") &&
(amdgpu_pm_load_smu_firmware(adev, _version) == 0)
> Fixes:
Am 12.06.19 um 23:13 schrieb Yang, Philip:
> On 2019-06-12 3:28 p.m., Christian König wrote:
>> Am 12.06.19 um 17:13 schrieb Yang, Philip:
>>> TTM create two zones, kernel zone and dma32 zone for system memory. If
>>> system memory address allocated is below 4GB, this account to dma32 zone
>>> and
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 08:18:54AM +0530, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:35:26PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:34 PM Hariprasad Kelam
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > this patch fixes below compilation error
> > >
> > >
27 matches
Mail list logo
