[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix ras ctrl debugfs node leak

2019-09-15 Thread Chen, Guchun
Use debugfs_remove_recursive to remove the whole debugfs directory instead of removing the node one by one. Change-Id: I27e9edab20d568b16d0163f8c7c3d81fb6832acd Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 12 +--- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h | 2

[PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix compile error due to 'endif' missing

2019-09-15 Thread Austin Kim
gcc throws compile error with below message: HDRINST usr/include/drm/i915_drm.h drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/Makefile:70: *** missing 'endif'. Stop. scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:55: recipe for target 'drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu' failed make[3]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu]

Re: [Nouveau] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 08/17] drm/ttm: use gem vma_node

2019-09-15 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 07:53, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 09:58:46PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 7:55 AM Thierry Reding > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:33:58PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 20:14, Gerd

RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove program of lbpw for renoir

2019-09-15 Thread Huang, Ray
> -Original Message- > From: Liu, Aaron > Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 9:40 AM > To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Deucher, Alexander ; Huang, Ray > ; Liu, Aaron > Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove program of lbpw for renoir > > These is no LBPW on Renoir. So removing

[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove program of lbpw for renoir

2019-09-15 Thread Liu, Aaron
These is no LBPW on Renoir. So removing program of lbpw for renoir. Signed-off-by: Aaron Liu --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c index b75ef89..fe21ef8

Re: gnome-shell stuck because of amdgpu driver [5.3 RC5]

2019-09-15 Thread Mikhail Gavrilov
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 14:15, Koenig, Christian wrote: > > I agree with Daniels analysis. > > It looks like the problem is simply that PM turns of a block before all > work is done on that block. > > Have you opened a bug report yet? If not then that would certainly help > cause it is really hard