When the compute is malfunctioning or performance drops, the system admin
will use SMI (System Management Interface) tool to monitor/diagnostic what
went wrong. This patch provides an event watch interface for the user
space to register devices and subscribe events they are interested. After
regist
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui
-Original Message-
From: Liang, Prike
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 11:43 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Deucher, Alexander ; Huang, Ray
; Liang, Prike
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay: fix resu
Hi Dave, Daniel,
Fixes for 5.7.
The following changes since commit 7e7ea24f0b46cd3078bc9af29d1c1aced89d1c8e:
drm/amdgpu/display: fix warning when compiling without debugfs (2020-04-08
17:53:11 -0400)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux tags/am
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
Reviewed-By: Kent Russell
> -Original Message-
> From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of
> Rajneesh Bhardwaj
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 12:34 PM
> To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/gmc
Fixes a minor typo in the file.
Reviewed-by: Christian König
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
Signed-off-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c
b/driver
[AMD Public Use]
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
From: Liang, Prike
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 11:43 AM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Deucher, Alexander ; Huang, Ray
; Liang, Prike
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay: fix resume failed as smu table initi
When the amdgpu in the suspend/resume loop need notify the dpm disabled,
otherwise the smu table will be uninitialize and result in resume failed.
Signed-off-by: Prike Liang
Tested-by: Mengbing Wang
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/renoir_ppt.c | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 d
Am 2020-04-15 um 9:48 a.m. schrieb Deucher, Alexander:
>
> [AMD Public Use]
>
>
> We use the drm major/minor in all cases. Bump KMS_DRIVER_MINOR in
> amdgpu_drv.c and add a note about what was added in the comment.
The KFD ioctl API has its own major and minor version defined in
include/uapi/li
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
The test does not access outside of the allocated memory. But it deliberately
crosses a boundary where memory can be allocated non-contiguously. This is
meant to catch problems where the access function doesn't handle non-contiguous
VRAM allo
[AMD Public Use]
I've gone ahead and dropped the patch.
Alex
From: Koenig, Christian
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 3:57 AM
To: Jani Nikula ; Alex Deucher
; Bernard Zhao
Cc: Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex) ; Zeng, Oak
; Maling list - DRI developers
; David Ai
[AMD Public Use]
We use the drm major/minor in all cases. Bump KMS_DRIVER_MINOR in
amdgpu_drv.c and add a note about what was added in the comment.
Alex
From: Lin, Amber
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 9:36 AM
To: Deucher, Alexander ; Kuehling, Felix
; amd-gf
Thank you Felix. Now I understand the problem of global client ID is
leaking a hole for potential attackers. I didn't take that into
consideration. I'll change that following your advice below.
Hi Alex,
Thank you for the link. It's helpful. I have a question regarding the
versioning. One topi
From: Christian König
> Sent: 15 April 2020 08:57
> Am 15.04.20 um 09:41 schrieb Jani Nikula:
> > On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:05 AM Bernard Zhao wrote:
> >>> On some processors, the / operate will call the compiler`s div lib,
> >>> which is low efficien
Alex, Harry, Christian, can you please eyeball this series and see if it
makes sense for you?
Thanks,
Jani.
On Tue, 07 Apr 2020, Jeevan B wrote:
> From: Oleg Vasilev
>
> Since DP-specific information is stored in driver's structures, every
> driver needs to implement subconnector property by
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 04:31:39PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Can we put this new automated check will be behind a configuration flag
> initially? Or at least make it a warning and not a hard error.
I'll try and get the patches merged in mainline objtool but with a flag
that isn't used by def
I think this code in amdgpu_vcn.c right now is only for vcn2.0 and above.
why it can affect raven?
we need rerun Video play back test case on renoir, see if it still
needs this WA.
Thanks!
James
On 2020-04-15 7:27 a.m., Zhu, Changfeng wrote:
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
Do we know if whatever issue was actually fixed on renoir? If not, I'd say
just leave it for now.
Alex
From: amd-gfx on behalf of Zhu,
Changfeng
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 7:27 AM
To: Zhang, Hawking ;
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
It's all good. I pushed a copy to amd-staging-drm-next, reviewed by Andrey.
Thanks for pushing it to drm-misc-fixes!
Kent
> -Original Message-
> From: Koenig, Christian
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 6:36 AM
> To: Grodzovsky, And
From: Jack Zhang
[ Upstream commit 3148a6a0ef3cf93570f30a477292768f7eb5d3c3 ]
Originally, it kfrees the wrong pointer for mem_obj.
It would cause memory leak under stress test.
Signed-off-by: Jack Zhang
Acked-by: Nirmoy Das
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
drivers
From: Jack Zhang
[ Upstream commit 3148a6a0ef3cf93570f30a477292768f7eb5d3c3 ]
Originally, it kfrees the wrong pointer for mem_obj.
It would cause memory leak under stress test.
Signed-off-by: Jack Zhang
Acked-by: Nirmoy Das
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
drivers
From: Jack Zhang
[ Upstream commit 3148a6a0ef3cf93570f30a477292768f7eb5d3c3 ]
Originally, it kfrees the wrong pointer for mem_obj.
It would cause memory leak under stress test.
Signed-off-by: Jack Zhang
Acked-by: Nirmoy Das
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
drivers
From: Jack Zhang
[ Upstream commit 3148a6a0ef3cf93570f30a477292768f7eb5d3c3 ]
Originally, it kfrees the wrong pointer for mem_obj.
It would cause memory leak under stress test.
Signed-off-by: Jack Zhang
Acked-by: Nirmoy Das
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
drivers
From: Jack Zhang
[ Upstream commit 3148a6a0ef3cf93570f30a477292768f7eb5d3c3 ]
Originally, it kfrees the wrong pointer for mem_obj.
It would cause memory leak under stress test.
Signed-off-by: Jack Zhang
Acked-by: Nirmoy Das
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
drivers
From: Bhawanpreet Lakha
[ Upstream commit c2850c125d919efbb3a9ab46410d23912934f585 ]
[Why]
When content type property is set to 1. We should enable hdcp2.2 and if we cant
then stop. Currently the way it works in DC is that if we fail hdcp2, we will
try hdcp1 after.
[How]
Use link config to forc
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
After drop this WA,
It can't enter GFXOFF on raven2.
And it can't run S3 successfully on Picasso and raven1.
I suggest that it can add chip type and drop this WA only on renoir.
BR,
Changfeng
-Original Message-
From: Zhang, Hawking
we should avoid to show the invalid level value when the
DPM_LEVELS supported number changed
Signed-off-by: Yuxian Dai
Change-Id: Ib66d0cf34a866fa6f0cedd1d5fc642f59236787d
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/renoir_ppt.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pow
To elaborate on the PTRACE test, we PEEK 2 DWORDs inside thunk
allocated mapped memory and 2 DWORDS outside that boundary (it’s only
about 4MB to the boundary). Then we POKE to swap the DWORD positions
across the boundary. The RAS event on the single failing machine
happens on the out of boun
Sorry for the holiday/vacation/COVID-19 delay. I've just pushed this
patch into drm-misc-fixes.
I assume it already landed in our internal branches?
Thanks,
Christian.
Am 14.04.20 um 16:33 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
Reviewed-by: Andrey Grodzovsky
Andrey
On 4/14/20 10:22 AM, Kent Russell wr
[AMD Public Use]
Hi Christian,
That could potentially be it. With additional testing, 2 of 3 Vega20 machines
never hit error over BAR access with the PTRACE test. 3 of 3 machines (from
the same pool) always hit error with CWSR.
To elaborate on the PTRACE test, we PEEK 2 DWORDs inside thunk al
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 9:57 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 15.04.20 um 09:41 schrieb Jani Nikula:
> > On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:05 AM Bernard Zhao wrote:
> >>> On some processors, the / operate will call the compiler`s div lib,
> >>> which is low
Add insn_is_fpu(insn) which tells that the insn is
whether touch the FPU/SSE/MMX register or the instruction
of FP coprocessor.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu
---
Changes in v4:
- Fix to match x87-opcode pattern with opcode instead
of ext(ension).
---
arch/x86/include/asm/inat.h
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:22:30 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> @@ -318,10 +331,14 @@ function convert_operands(count,opnd, i,j,imm,mod)
> if (match(opcode, rex_expr))
> flags = add_flags(flags,
> "INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_REX)")
>
> - # chec
Hi Jon,
Also cwsr tests fail on Vega20 with or without the revert with the
same RAS error.
That sounds like the system/setup has a more general problem.
Could it be that we are seeing RAS errors because there really is some
hardware failure, but with the MM path we don't trigger a RAS interr
Am 15.04.20 um 09:41 schrieb Jani Nikula:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:05 AM Bernard Zhao wrote:
On some processors, the / operate will call the compiler`s div lib,
which is low efficient, We can replace the / operation with shift,
so that we can replace
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:05 AM Bernard Zhao wrote:
>>
>> On some processors, the / operate will call the compiler`s div lib,
>> which is low efficient, We can replace the / operation with shift,
>> so that we can replace the call of the division library
35 matches
Mail list logo
