Quoting Brian Welty (2021-01-26 23:46:24)
> Single control below is added to DRM cgroup controller in order to track
> user execution time for GPU devices. It is up to device drivers to
> charge execution time to the cgroup via drm_cgroup_try_charge().
>
> sched.runtime
> Read-only value,
Quoting Thomas Zimmermann (2020-11-24 13:38:16)
> Using struct drm_device.pdev is deprecated. Convert i915 to struct
> drm_device.dev. No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann
> Cc: Jani Nikula
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi
Any chance of
Quoting john.hubb...@gmail.com (2019-08-02 05:19:37)
> From: John Hubbard
>
> For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages
> via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or
> release_pages().
>
> This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in
Quoting Kuehling, Felix (2018-12-03 22:55:16)
>
> On 2018-11-28 4:14 a.m., Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Quoting Ho, Kenny (2018-11-27 17:41:17)
> >> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 4:46 AM Joonas Lahtinen
> >> wrote:
> >>> I think a more abstract property &quo
Quoting Ho, Kenny (2018-11-27 17:41:17)
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 4:46 AM Joonas Lahtinen
> wrote:
> > I think a more abstract property "% of GPU (processing power)" might
> > be a more universal approach. One can then implement that through
> > subdividing
Quoting Kasiviswanathan, Harish (2018-11-26 22:59:30)
> Thanks Tejun,Eric and Christian for your replies.
>
> We want GPUs resource management to work seamlessly with containers and
> container orchestration. With the Intel / bpf based approach this is not
> possible.
>
> From your response we
