t least this shared pci code should
be solid.
> I'm not sure yet what's going wrong with the Thunderbold controller, but
> completely re-assigning bus numbers is certainly the wrong approach.
I agree, it is just what is currently available in the kernel. A less
disruptive approach seems needed.
--Kurt Kartaltepe
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 2:54 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
>
> Well what problems do you run into? The ACPI and BIOS assignments
> usually work much better than whatever the Linux PCI subsystem comes up
> with.
Perhaps its easier to show the lspci output for the BIOS assignment
and we can agree it'
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 8:42 AM Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:19 AM Kurt Kartaltepe
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 6:37 AM Alex Deucher wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 4:47 AM Kurt Kartaltepe
> > > w
i'm considering it may be better, though not
upstreamable, to implement renumbering only for specified devices like
this pci bridge or investigate runtime management of the pci bus
addresses. The current assign-busses implementation is quite the big
hammer admittedly.
--Kurt Kartaltepe
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 6:37 AM Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 4:47 AM Kurt Kartaltepe wrote:
> >
> > These checks prevent using amdgpu with the pcie=assign-busses parameter
> > which will re-address devices from their acpi values.
> >
>
These checks prevent using amdgpu with the pcie=assign-busses parameter
which will re-address devices from their acpi values.
Signed-off-by: Kurt Kartaltepe
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bios.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu
