We are deprecating calls which return NULL in favor of new variants which
return an ERR_PTR. Only build tested.
Wolfram Sang (6):
drm/amdgpu: convert to use i2c_new_client_device()
drm/gma500: convert to use i2c_new_client_device()
drm/i2c/sil164: convert to use i2c_new_client_device
Move away from the deprecated API.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dpm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dpm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dpm.c
index ba1bb95a3cf9..0e8018c9aa8e
Move away from the deprecated API.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_atombios.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_combios.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_atombios.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm
> > > > Move away from the deprecated API.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
> > >
> > > patches 1,6, are:
> > > Acked-by: Alex Deucher
> > Should we commit all to drm-misc-next?
>
> I'm fine to see it go
> Preferably this series should be applied via the i2c tree.
Are we in a hurry here, i.e. does it block further development of the
i801 smbus driver? My gut feeling says the patches should rather go via
drm and fbdev trees, but I may be convinced otherwise.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signa
> We're not in a hurry. It's just my experience with patch series' affecting
> multiple subsystems that typically the decision was to apply the full
> series via one tree. Also to avoid inquires from maintainers like:
> Shall I take it or are you going to take it?
> Of course there may be differen
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 10:40:20AM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> After removal of the legacy EEPROM driver and I2C_CLASS_DDC support in
> olpc_dcon there's no i2c client driver left supporting I2C_CLASS_DDC.
> Class-based device auto-detection is a legacy mechanism and shouldn't
> be used in new
Hi Alex,
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 01:15:32PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 8:02 AM Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >
> > Support for I2C_CLASS_SPD is currently being removed from the kernel.
> > Only remaining step is to remove the definition of I2C_CLASS_SPD.
> > Setting I2C_CLASS
The old email address bounced. I found the newer one in recent git history,
update MAINTAINERS accordingly.
Cc: Evan Quan
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
---
Against v6.10-rc1. Still needs ack from Evan Quan
MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a
> Evan no longer maintains the SWSMU code, it should be changed to Kenneth and
> Jun (CCed).
Thanks for the heads up! Kenneth, Jun, will you send a patch or shall I?
If you send one, please add:
Reported-by: Wolfram Sang
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> > remove I2C_CLASS_SPD without further dependencies? If you prefer to push
> > it through your tree, can you send it to Linus soon?
>
> Yes, I'll include the patch in my PR for this week.
Awesome, thank you!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Easwar,
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:24PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of the
>
Hi Easwar,
> Sorry, got excited. :) There were drivers I'd been part of that I specifically
> wanted to fixup, but then the scope grew to other users of algobit.
Well, you got some positive feedback, so that is good.
> > It is true that I changed quite some controller drivers within the i2c
> >
> I created an immutable branch for this which the buildbots will
> hopefully check over night. I will reply with comments tomorrow when I
> got the buildbot results.
Applied to for-next, thanks!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 12:37:15PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> I2C_CLASS_SPD was used to expose the EEPROM content to user space,
> via the legacy eeprom driver. Now that this driver has been removed,
> we can remove I2C_CLASS_SPD support. at24 driver with explicit
> instantiation should be use
> Should I send a revert, or is there a way to fix this?
You are the second one to report this problem and so far, there has been
no response from the authors. I will prepare a revert and CC all
involved people. Thank you for the nagging!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ex.ru
BugLink: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1850
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
---
So far, I tested it on a Renesas R-Car M3-N board verifying that I2C
still works. I'll apply it to my for-next branch right away to get the
buildbots involved as well. But I am still open for comments u
> Tested-by: Konstantin Kharlamov
Thanks!
> By the way, shouldn't the patch include a field
>
> Cc: # 5.14+
Yes, but I add such lines only when applying to my tree. If I add it
when sending out patches, the mail gets CCed to stable although the
patch is not upstream yet.
sign
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 01:24:52PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> This largely reverts commit 5a7b95fb993ec399c8a685552aa6a8fc995c40bd. It
> breaks suspend with AMD GPUs, and we couldn't incrementally fix it. So,
> let's remove the code and go back to the drawing board. W
Hi everyone,
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 01:24:52PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> This largely reverts commit 5a7b95fb993ec399c8a685552aa6a8fc995c40bd. It
> breaks suspend with AMD GPUs, and we couldn't incrementally fix it. So,
> let's remove the code and go back to the drawing
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 07:22:44PM +, Tareque Md.Hanif wrote:
> The issue still exists. It takes very long time to suspend (10-12s).
> `DRI_PRIME=1 glxgears` is a black window.
>
> journalctl attached
> Looking forward to any testing.
Any new ideas which Tareque could test?
signature.asc
Follow the advice of the below link and prefer 'strscpy' in this
subsystem. Conversion is 1:1 because the return value is not used.
Generated by a coccinelle script.
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wgfRnXz0W3D37d01q3JFkr_i_uTL=v6a6g1ouzcprm...@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Wo
22 matches
Mail list logo
