Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/25] dma-buf.rst: Document why idenfinite fences are a bad idea

2020-07-09 Thread Christian König
Am 09.07.20 um 14:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter: On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:11 PM Daniel Stone wrote: On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 09:05, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 08:36:43AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 21:13, Daniel Vetter wrote: Comes up every few years, gets

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/25] dma-buf.rst: Document why idenfinite fences are a bad idea

2020-07-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:11 PM Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 09:05, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 08:36:43AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 21:13, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > Comes up every few years, gets somewhat tedious to discuss,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/25] dma-buf.rst: Document why idenfinite fences are a bad idea

2020-07-09 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 09:05, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 08:36:43AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 21:13, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Comes up every few years, gets somewhat tedious to discuss, let's > > > write this down once and for all. > > > > Thanks

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/25] dma-buf.rst: Document why idenfinite fences are a bad idea

2020-07-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 08:36:43AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 21:13, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Comes up every few years, gets somewhat tedious to discuss, let's > > write this down once and for all. > > Thanks for writing this up! I wonder if any of the notes from

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/25] dma-buf.rst: Document why idenfinite fences are a bad idea

2020-07-09 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 21:13, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Comes up every few years, gets somewhat tedious to discuss, let's > write this down once and for all. Thanks for writing this up! I wonder if any of the notes from my reply to the previous-version thread would be helpful to more explicitly