RE: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: consider paging job always not guilty

Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: consider paging job always not guilty Am 20.07.21 um 13:02 schrieb Jingwen Chen: > [Why] > Currently all timedout job will be considered to be guilty. In SRIOV > multi-vf use case, the vf flr happens first and then job time out is > foun

[PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: consider paging job always not guilty

[Why] Currently all timedout job will be considered to be guilty. In SRIOV multi-vf use case, the vf flr happens first and then job time out is found. There can be several jobs timeout during a very small time slice. And if the innocent sdma job time out is found before the real bad job, then the

Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: consider paging job always not guilty

Am 20.07.21 um 13:02 schrieb Jingwen Chen: [Why] Currently all timedout job will be considered to be guilty. In SRIOV multi-vf use case, the vf flr happens first and then job time out is found. There can be several jobs timeout during a very small time slice. And if the innocent sdma job time