On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:54 PM Kees Cook wrote:
>
> Instead of reading the desired 5 bytes of the actual target field,
> the code was reading 8. This could result in a corrupted value if the
> trailing 3 bytes were non-zero, so instead use an appropriately sized
> and zero-initialized bounce buff
Instead of reading the desired 5 bytes of the actual target field,
the code was reading 8. This could result in a corrupted value if the
trailing 3 bytes were non-zero, so instead use an appropriately sized
and zero-initialized bounce buffer, and read only 5 bytes before casting
to u64.
Signed-off
