On 2020-08-25 10:34 a.m., Nirmoy wrote:
>
> On 8/25/20 4:18 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> virtual display is non-atomic so report false to avoid checking
>
> With below nitpick fixed, Acked-by: Nirmoy Das
Another nitpick: "below" is not an adjective. It's a preposition or in
this case as an
On 8/25/20 4:18 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
virtual display is non-atomic so report false to avoid checking
With below nitpick fixed, Acked-by: Nirmoy Das
virtual --> Virtual
Nirmoy
atomic state and other atomic things at runtime.
v2: squash into the sr-iov check
Signed-off-by: Alex
[AMD Public Use]
Acked-by: Guchun Chen
Regards,
Guchun
-Original Message-
From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of Alex Deucher
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 10:18 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Deucher, Alexander
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: report DC not supported if virtual display
virtual display is non-atomic so report false to avoid checking
atomic state and other atomic things at runtime.
v2: squash into the sr-iov check
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
[AMD Public Use]
I can do that.
Alex
From: Chen, Guchun
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 10:13 AM
To: Alex Deucher ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Deucher, Alexander
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: report DC not supported if virtual display is
enabled
[AMD Public Use]
Why not merging it to the same line of SRIOV check?
if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) || adev->enable_virtual_display )
return false;
Regards,
Guchun
-Original Message-
From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of Alex Deucher
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 9:45 PM
To:
virtual display is non-atomic so report false to avoid checking
atomic state and other atomic things at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
