On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:46:47AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 06:00:15PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Hi Daniel.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:03:34PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
> > > the d
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 06:00:15PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Daniel.
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:03:34PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
> > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
> > confu
Hi Daniel.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:03:34PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
> the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
> confusing. Split them out.
>
> To make sure I actually achieved the goal here
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 11:13 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel et al.
>
> > >
> > > Yeah the drm_crtc_helper.h header is a bit the miniature drmP.h for legacy
> > > kms drivers. Just removing it from all the atomic drivers caused lots of
> > > fallout, I expect even more if you entirely remove
Hi Daniel et al.
> >
> > Yeah the drm_crtc_helper.h header is a bit the miniature drmP.h for legacy
> > kms drivers. Just removing it from all the atomic drivers caused lots of
> > fallout, I expect even more if you entirely remove the includes it has.
> > Maybe a todo, care to pls create that pa
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 05:45:41PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:10:18PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Hi Daniel.
> >
> > > v5: Actually try to sort them, and while at it, sort all the ones I
> > > touch.
> >
> > Applied this variant on top of drm-misc and did a build
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:10:18PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Daniel.
>
> > v5: Actually try to sort them, and while at it, sort all the ones I
> > touch.
>
> Applied this variant on top of drm-misc and did a build test.
> Looked good for ia64, x86 and alpha.
>
> Took a closer look at the c
Hi Daniel.
> v5: Actually try to sort them, and while at it, sort all the ones I
> touch.
Applied this variant on top of drm-misc and did a build test.
Looked good for ia64, x86 and alpha.
Took a closer look at the changes to atmel_hlcd - and they looked OK.
But I noticed that atmel_hlcdc uses
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:41 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
> the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
> confusing. Split them out.
>
> To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all
>
On 1/15/19 2:26 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
On 15/01/2019 11:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
confusing. Split them out.
To make sure I actually achieved the goal her
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 12:41:37 EET Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
> the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
> confusing. Split them out.
>
> To make sure I actuall
On 15/01/2019 11:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
> the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
> confusing. Split them out.
>
> To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all
> drivers. And
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in
> the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is
> confusing. Split them out.
>
> To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all
> drivers. And
13 matches
Mail list logo
