on with some other clock. It's still ostensibly in the
highest DPM state.
Alex
>
> Thanks,
> Lijo
>
> > Regards,
> > Luben
> >
> >>
> >> Alex
> >>
> >>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Luben
> >>>
> >>>
> &g
er 19, 2021 12:27 AM
To: Russell, Kent ; Deucher, Alexander ;
Quan, Evan ; Lazar, Lijo ;
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Kasiviswanathan, Harish
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] 0 MHz is not a valid current frequency
Kent,
What is the command which fails?
I can try to duplicate it here.
So far, things
o make it more
>> robust, that would be nice. But the -c flag is supposed to show the current
>> frequency for each clock type. -g would do the same, but just for SCLK.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kent
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Tuikov, Luben
>> Sent: Tues
: Kasiviswanathan, Harish
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] 0 MHz is not a valid current frequency
>
>
>
> [AMD Official Use Only]
>
>
>
> +Harish, rocm-smi falls under his purview now.
>
>
>
> Kent
>
>
>
> From: Tuikov, Luben
> Sent: Monday, October
sell, Kent ;
Deucher, Alexander ;
Quan, Evan ;
Lazar, Lijo ;
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Kasiviswanathan, Harish
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] 0 MHz i
, 2021 12:27 AM
To: Russell, Kent ; Deucher, Alexander
; Quan, Evan ; Lazar, Lijo
; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Kasiviswanathan, Harish
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] 0 MHz is not a valid current frequency
Kent,
What is the command which fails?
I can try to duplicate it here.
So far, things
@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Kasiviswanathan, Harish
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] 0 MHz is not a valid
current frequency
[AMD
Official Use Only]
+Harish
ilto:evan.q...@amd.com>>; Lazar, Lijo
mailto:lijo.la...@amd.com>>;
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Russell,
Kent mailto:kent.russ...@amd.com>>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] 0 MHz is not a valid current frequency
I think Kent is already see
org>
<mailto:amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Russell,
Kent <mailto:kent.russ...@amd.com>
Cc: Deucher, Alexander
<mailto:alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] 0 MHz is not a valid current frequency
[AMD Official Use Only]
+Kent who maintains the Rocm tool
From: amd-gfx
<
, October 14, 2021 10:25 PM
To: Lazar, Lijo ; Tuikov,
Luben ;
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
; Russell, Kent
Cc: Deucher, Alexander
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] 0 MHz is not a valid current
frequency
; Russell, Kent
Cc: Deucher, Alexander
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] 0 MHz is not a valid current frequency
[AMD Official Use Only]
+Kent who maintains the Rocm tool
From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of Lazar, Lijo
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 1:07 AM
To: Tuikov, Luben ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc
[AMD Official Use Only]
+Kent who maintains the Rocm tool
From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of Lazar, Lijo
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 1:07 AM
To: Tuikov, Luben ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Deucher, Alexander
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] 0 MHz is not a valid current frequency
[AMD Official Use
Some ASICs support low-power functionality for the whole ASIC or just
an IP block. When in such low-power mode, some sysfs interfaces would
report a frequency of 0, e.g.,
$cat /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_dpm_sclk
0: 500Mhz
1: 0Mhz *
2: 2200Mhz
$_
An operating frequency of 0 MHz doesn't make
evel. Evan/Alex? Don't know if this will crash the
> tools.
>
That seems reasonable to me.
Alex
> Thanks,
> Lijo
>
> From: Tuikov, Luben
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 9:52:09 PM
> To: Lazar, Lijo ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>
>
ijo
From: Tuikov, Luben
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 9:52:09 PM
To: Lazar, Lijo ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Deucher, Alexander
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] 0 MHz is not a valid current frequency
On 2021-10-13 00:14, Lazar, Lijo wrote:
>
> On 10/13/2021 8:40 AM, Luben Tuikov wrote
On 2021-10-13 00:14, Lazar, Lijo wrote:
>
> On 10/13/2021 8:40 AM, Luben Tuikov wrote:
>> Some ASIC support low-power functionality for the whole ASIC or just
>> an IP block. When in such low-power mode, some sysfs interfaces would
>> report a frequency of 0, e.g.,
>>
>> $cat
Some ASIC support low-power functionality for the whole ASIC or just
an IP block. When in such low-power mode, some sysfs interfaces would
report a frequency of 0, e.g.,
$cat /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_dpm_sclk
0: 500Mhz
1: 0Mhz *
2: 2200Mhz
$_
An operating frequency of 0 MHz doesn't make
On 10/13/2021 7:28 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:14 AM Lazar, Lijo wrote:
On 10/13/2021 8:40 AM, Luben Tuikov wrote:
Some ASIC support low-power functionality for the whole ASIC or just
an IP block. When in such low-power mode, some sysfs interfaces would
report a
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:14 AM Lazar, Lijo wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/13/2021 8:40 AM, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> > Some ASIC support low-power functionality for the whole ASIC or just
> > an IP block. When in such low-power mode, some sysfs interfaces would
> > report a frequency of 0, e.g.,
> >
> > $cat
; From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of
> Lazar, Lijo
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 12:14 PM
> To: Tuikov, Luben ; amd-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Deucher, Alexander
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] 0 MHz is not a valid current frequency
>
>
>
> On 10/13/2021 8:40
On 10/13/2021 8:40 AM, Luben Tuikov wrote:
Some ASIC support low-power functionality for the whole ASIC or just
an IP block. When in such low-power mode, some sysfs interfaces would
report a frequency of 0, e.g.,
$cat /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_dpm_sclk
0: 500Mhz
1: 0Mhz *
2: 2200Mhz
$_
Some ASIC support low-power functionality for the whole ASIC or just
an IP block. When in such low-power mode, some sysfs interfaces would
report a frequency of 0, e.g.,
$cat /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_dpm_sclk
0: 500Mhz
1: 0Mhz *
2: 2200Mhz
$_
An operating frequency of 0 MHz doesn't make
22 matches
Mail list logo
