Hi,
As suggested by Christian, we should move non-x86 definitions into one common
header, and it will make the codes readable. They are based on the improvement
fix of Bas (already rebase Bas's patch to drm-next).
Thanks,
Ray
Bas Nieuwenhuizen (1):
drm/ttm: Merge hugepage attr changes in ttm_d
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 05:18:46PM +0800, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> Hi Ray,
>
>
> On 2018-07-26 11:14 AM, Huang Rui wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As suggested by Christian, we should move non-x86 definitions into one
> > common
> > header, and it will make the codes readable. They are based on the
>
Hi Ray,
On 2018-07-26 11:14 AM, Huang Rui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As suggested by Christian, we should move non-x86 definitions into one common
> header, and it will make the codes readable. They are based on the improvement
> fix of Bas (already rebase Bas's patch to drm-next).
TTM patches need to b
Hi,
As suggested by Christian, we should move non-x86 definitions into one common
header, and it will make the codes readable. They are based on the improvement
fix of Bas (already rebase Bas's patch to drm-next).
Thanks,
Ray
Bas Nieuwenhuizen (1):
drm/ttm: Merge hugepage attr changes in ttm_d
