Am 14.01.21 um 22:13 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
Am 2021-01-14 um 11:51 a.m. schrieb Jerome Glisse:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 02:37:36PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
Am 14.01.21 um 12:52 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
[SNIP]
I had a new idea, i wanted to think more about it but have not yet,
anyway here
Am 2021-01-14 um 11:51 a.m. schrieb Jerome Glisse:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 02:37:36PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 14.01.21 um 12:52 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> [SNIP]
> I had a new idea, i wanted to think more about it but have not yet,
> anyway here it is. Adding a new callback t
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 08:08:06PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 14.01.21 um 17:36 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 5:01 PM Christian König
> > wrote:
> > > Am 14.01.21 um 16:40 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > > [SNIP]
> > > > > So I think we have to somehow solve this in the k
Am 14.01.21 um 17:36 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 5:01 PM Christian König
wrote:
Am 14.01.21 um 16:40 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
[SNIP]
So I think we have to somehow solve this in the kernel or we will go in
circles all the time.
So from that pov I think the kernel should at m
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 02:37:36PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 14.01.21 um 12:52 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > [SNIP]
> > > > I had a new idea, i wanted to think more about it but have not yet,
> > > > anyway here it is. Adding a new callback to dma fence which ask the
> > > > question can it
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 5:01 PM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 14.01.21 um 16:40 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > [SNIP]
> >> So I think we have to somehow solve this in the kernel or we will go in
> >> circles all the time.
> >>
> >>> So from that pov I think the kernel should at most deal with an
> >>>
Am 14.01.21 um 16:40 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
[SNIP]
So I think we have to somehow solve this in the kernel or we will go in
circles all the time.
So from that pov I think the kernel should at most deal with an
hmm_fence for cross-process communication and maybe some standard wait
primitives (fo
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 4:08 PM Christian König
wrote:
> Am 14.01.21 um 15:23 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:13 PM Christian König
> > wrote:
> >> Am 14.01.21 um 14:57 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 2:37 PM Christian König
> >>> wrote:
> Am 14.01.
Am 14.01.21 um 15:23 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:13 PM Christian König
wrote:
Am 14.01.21 um 14:57 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 2:37 PM Christian König
wrote:
Am 14.01.21 um 12:52 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
[SNIP]
I had a new idea, i wanted to think more
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:13 PM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 14.01.21 um 14:57 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 2:37 PM Christian König
> > wrote:
> >> Am 14.01.21 um 12:52 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >>> [SNIP]
> > I had a new idea, i wanted to think more about it but have no
Am 14.01.21 um 14:57 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 2:37 PM Christian König
wrote:
Am 14.01.21 um 12:52 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
[SNIP]
I had a new idea, i wanted to think more about it but have not yet,
anyway here it is. Adding a new callback to dma fence which ask the
questio
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 2:37 PM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 14.01.21 um 12:52 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > [SNIP]
> >>> I had a new idea, i wanted to think more about it but have not yet,
> >>> anyway here it is. Adding a new callback to dma fence which ask the
> >>> question can it dead lock ? An
Am 14.01.21 um 12:52 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
[SNIP]
I had a new idea, i wanted to think more about it but have not yet,
anyway here it is. Adding a new callback to dma fence which ask the
question can it dead lock ? Any time a GPU driver has pending page
fault (ie something calling into the mm) i
Am 14.01.21 um 06:34 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
Am 2021-01-11 um 11:29 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:56:24PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
Am 2021-01-08 um 11:53 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 5:36 PM Felix Kuehling wrote:
Am 2021-01-08 um 11:06 a.m.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:49 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 13.01.21 um 17:56 schrieb Jerome Glisse:
> > On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 03:40:07PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:25:41AM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> >>> Am 2021-01-07 um 4:23 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>
Am 13.01.21 um 17:56 schrieb Jerome Glisse:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 03:40:07PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:25:41AM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
Am 2021-01-07 um 4:23 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:00:52PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
This is
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:26 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 4:27 AM Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:31:11PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:56 PM Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 03:40:07PM +0100, Danie
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 4:27 AM Jerome Glisse wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:31:11PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:56 PM Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 03:40:07PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:25:41AM -0500, F
Am 2021-01-11 um 11:29 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:56:24PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> Am 2021-01-08 um 11:53 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 5:36 PM Felix Kuehling
>>> wrote:
Am 2021-01-08 um 11:06 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:31:11PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:56 PM Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 03:40:07PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:25:41AM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> > > > Am 2021-01-07 um 4:23 a.m. schrieb
Am 2021-01-13 um 11:47 a.m. schrieb Jerome Glisse:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:00:52PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> This is the first version of our HMM based shared virtual memory manager
>> for KFD. There are still a number of known issues that we're working through
>> (see below). This will
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:56 PM Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 03:40:07PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:25:41AM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> > > Am 2021-01-07 um 4:23 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:00:52PM -0500, Felix
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 03:40:07PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:25:41AM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> > Am 2021-01-07 um 4:23 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:00:52PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> > >> This is the first version of our HMM ba
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:00:52PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> This is the first version of our HMM based shared virtual memory manager
> for KFD. There are still a number of known issues that we're working through
> (see below). This will likely lead to some pretty significant changes in
> MMU
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:56:24PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>
> Am 2021-01-08 um 11:53 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 5:36 PM Felix Kuehling
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 2021-01-08 um 11:06 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 4:58 PM Felix Kuehling
>
Am 2021-01-08 um 11:53 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 5:36 PM Felix Kuehling wrote:
>>
>> Am 2021-01-08 um 11:06 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 4:58 PM Felix Kuehling
>>> wrote:
Am 2021-01-08 um 9:40 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Thu, Ja
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 5:36 PM Felix Kuehling wrote:
>
>
> Am 2021-01-08 um 11:06 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 4:58 PM Felix Kuehling
> > wrote:
> >> Am 2021-01-08 um 9:40 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:25:41AM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
Am 2021-01-08 um 11:06 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 4:58 PM Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> Am 2021-01-08 um 9:40 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:25:41AM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
Am 2021-01-07 um 4:23 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, J
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 4:58 PM Felix Kuehling wrote:
>
> Am 2021-01-08 um 9:40 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:25:41AM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> >> Am 2021-01-07 um 4:23 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:00:52PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote
Am 2021-01-08 um 9:40 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:25:41AM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> Am 2021-01-07 um 4:23 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:00:52PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
This is the first version of our HMM based shared virtual
Am 08.01.21 um 15:40 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:25:41AM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
Am 2021-01-07 um 4:23 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:00:52PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
This is the first version of our HMM based shared virtual memory manager
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:25:41AM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> Am 2021-01-07 um 4:23 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:00:52PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> >> This is the first version of our HMM based shared virtual memory manager
> >> for KFD. There are still a numbe
Am 2021-01-07 um 4:23 a.m. schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:00:52PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> This is the first version of our HMM based shared virtual memory manager
>> for KFD. There are still a number of known issues that we're working through
>> (see below). This will l
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:00:52PM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> This is the first version of our HMM based shared virtual memory manager
> for KFD. There are still a number of known issues that we're working through
> (see below). This will likely lead to some pretty significant changes in
> MMU
This is the first version of our HMM based shared virtual memory manager
for KFD. There are still a number of known issues that we're working through
(see below). This will likely lead to some pretty significant changes in
MMU notifier handling and locking on the migration code paths. So don't
get
35 matches
Mail list logo
