Re: [PATCH 01/14] drm/amdgpu: Convert to Linux IRQ interfaces

2021-08-02 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 28.07.21 um 16:03 schrieb Alex Deucher: On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 6:27 AM Christian König wrote: Am 27.07.21 um 20:27 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: Drop the DRM IRQ midlayer in favor of Linux IRQ interfaces. DRM's IRQ helpers are mostly useful for UMS drivers. Modern KMS drivers don't benef

Re: [PATCH 01/14] drm/amdgpu: Convert to Linux IRQ interfaces

2021-07-28 Thread Christian König
Am 27.07.21 um 20:27 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: Drop the DRM IRQ midlayer in favor of Linux IRQ interfaces. DRM's IRQ helpers are mostly useful for UMS drivers. Modern KMS drivers don't benefit from using it. DRM IRQ callbacks are now being called directly or inlined. The interrupt number retur

Re: [PATCH 01/14] drm/amdgpu: Convert to Linux IRQ interfaces

2021-07-28 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 6:27 AM Christian König wrote: > > Am 27.07.21 um 20:27 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: > > Drop the DRM IRQ midlayer in favor of Linux IRQ interfaces. DRM's > > IRQ helpers are mostly useful for UMS drivers. Modern KMS drivers > > don't benefit from using it. > > > > DRM IRQ ca

[PATCH 01/14] drm/amdgpu: Convert to Linux IRQ interfaces

2021-07-27 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Drop the DRM IRQ midlayer in favor of Linux IRQ interfaces. DRM's IRQ helpers are mostly useful for UMS drivers. Modern KMS drivers don't benefit from using it. DRM IRQ callbacks are now being called directly or inlined. The interrupt number returned by pci_msi_vector() is now stored in struct am