Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Leave intel_conn->mst_port set, use mst_port_gone instead

2018-09-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 04:17:16PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 11:27 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:06:19PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > Currently we set intel_connector->mst_port to NULL to signify that the > > > MST port has been removed from

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Leave intel_conn->mst_port set, use mst_port_gone instead

2018-09-21 Thread Lyude Paul
On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 11:27 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:06:19PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > Currently we set intel_connector->mst_port to NULL to signify that the > > MST port has been removed from the system so that we can prevent further > > action on the port such

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Leave intel_conn->mst_port set, use mst_port_gone instead

2018-09-21 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:06:19PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > Currently we set intel_connector->mst_port to NULL to signify that the > MST port has been removed from the system so that we can prevent further > action on the port such as connector probes, mode probing, etc. > However, we're going

[PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Leave intel_conn->mst_port set, use mst_port_gone instead

2018-09-18 Thread Lyude Paul
Currently we set intel_connector->mst_port to NULL to signify that the MST port has been removed from the system so that we can prevent further action on the port such as connector probes, mode probing, etc. However, we're going to need access to intel_connector->mst_port in order to fixup