Am 2021-04-15 um 3:41 a.m. schrieb Christian König:
>
>
> Am 14.04.21 um 17:15 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
>> Am 2021-04-14 um 3:33 a.m. schrieb Christian König:
>>> Am 14.04.21 um 08:46 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
amdgpu_ttm_tt_unpopulate can be called during bo_destroy. The
dmabuf->resv
mu
Am 14.04.21 um 17:15 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
Am 2021-04-14 um 3:33 a.m. schrieb Christian König:
Am 14.04.21 um 08:46 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
amdgpu_ttm_tt_unpopulate can be called during bo_destroy. The
dmabuf->resv
must not be held by the caller or dma_buf_detach will deadlock. This is
prob
Am 2021-04-14 um 3:33 a.m. schrieb Christian König:
> Am 14.04.21 um 08:46 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
>> amdgpu_ttm_tt_unpopulate can be called during bo_destroy. The
>> dmabuf->resv
>> must not be held by the caller or dma_buf_detach will deadlock. This is
>> probably not the right fix. I get a recur
amdgpu_ttm_tt_unpopulate can be called during bo_destroy. The dmabuf->resv
must not be held by the caller or dma_buf_detach will deadlock. This is
probably not the right fix. I get a recursive lock warning with the
reservation held in ttm_bo_release. Should unmap_attachment move to
backend_unbind i
