[Public]
> -Original Message-
> From: Chen, Guchun
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 9:38 PM
> To: Quan, Evan ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Deucher, Alexander ; Lazar, Lijo
>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 1/7] drm/amd/pm: drop unneeded lock protection
>
[AMD Official Use Only]
> -Original Message-
> From: Lazar, Lijo
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 11:23 PM
> To: Quan, Evan ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Deucher, Alexander ; Chen, Guchun
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] drm/amd/pm: drop unneeded lock pr
Apart from patch 1, rest of the series is
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar
Patch 1 needs another look related to i2c transfers.
Thanks,
Lijo
On 1/17/2022 11:11 AM, Evan Quan wrote:
As all those APIs are already protected either by adev->pm.mutex
or smu->message_lock.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan
On 1/17/2022 11:11 AM, Evan Quan wrote:
As all those APIs are already protected either by adev->pm.mutex
or smu->message_lock.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan
Change-Id: I1db751fba9caabc5ca1314992961d3674212f9b0
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c | 315 ++
return -ENOMEM;
}
Regards,
Guchun
-Original Message-
From: Quan, Evan
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2022 1:42 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Deucher, Alexander ; Lazar, Lijo
; Chen, Guchun ; Quan, Evan
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/7] drm/amd/pm: drop unneeded lock protection smu->
As all those APIs are already protected either by adev->pm.mutex
or smu->message_lock.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan
Change-Id: I1db751fba9caabc5ca1314992961d3674212f9b0
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c | 315 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h | 1 -
