Re: [PATCH v2 04/21] drm/exynos: Introduce GEM object functions

2020-09-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:36:28PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 16.09.20 um 12:03 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:41PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > >> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in > >> struct drm_driver. This

Re: [PATCH v2 04/21] drm/exynos: Introduce GEM object functions

2020-09-16 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 16.09.20 um 12:03 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:41PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in >> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with >> per-instance callbacks in exynos.

Re: [PATCH v2 04/21] drm/exynos: Introduce GEM object functions

2020-09-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:41PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in > struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with > per-instance callbacks in exynos. The only exception is gem_prime_mmap, > which is

[PATCH v2 04/21] drm/exynos: Introduce GEM object functions

2020-09-15 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with per-instance callbacks in exynos. The only exception is gem_prime_mmap, which is non-trivial to convert. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann ---