On 6/23/24 01:51, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
Panels using a PWM-controlled backlight source without an do not have a
standard way to communicate their valid PWM ranges.
On x86 the ranges are read from ACPI through driver-specific tables.
The built-in ranges are not necessarily correct, or may grow s
Hi Thomas,
On 6/23/24 10:51 AM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Panels using a PWM-controlled backlight source without an do not have a
> standard way to communicate their valid PWM ranges.
> On x86 the ranges are read from ACPI through driver-specific tables.
> The built-in ranges are not necessarily c
On 6/23/2024 15:55, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 6/23/24 10:20 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
On 6/23/2024 03:51, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
Panels using a PWM-controlled backlight source without an do not have a
standard way to communicate their valid PWM ranges.
On x86 the ranges are read from ACP
Panels using a PWM-controlled backlight source without an do not have a
standard way to communicate their valid PWM ranges.
On x86 the ranges are read from ACPI through driver-specific tables.
The built-in ranges are not necessarily correct, or may grow stale if an
older device can be retrofitted w
Hi,
On 6/23/24 10:20 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 6/23/2024 03:51, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>> Panels using a PWM-controlled backlight source without an do not have a
>> standard way to communicate their valid PWM ranges.
>> On x86 the ranges are read from ACPI through driver-specific tables.
On 6/23/2024 03:51, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
Panels using a PWM-controlled backlight source without an do not have a
standard way to communicate their valid PWM ranges.
On x86 the ranges are read from ACPI through driver-specific tables.
The built-in ranges are not necessarily correct, or may grow
