On 7/22/2024 5:50 AM, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Easwar,
>
> merged to drm-intel-next. Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:27:31AM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by Wolfram's se
Hi Easwar,
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 09:15:08AM -0700, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> On 7/22/2024 5:50 AM, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi Easwar,
> >
> > merged to drm-intel-next. Thanks!
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:27:31AM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> >> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specific
Hi Easwar,
merged to drm-intel-next. Thanks!
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:27:31AM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/,
> fix the terminology for
Hi Easwar,
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:27:31AM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/,
> fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging int
Hi Easwar,
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:27:31AM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/,
> fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging int
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
with more appropriate terms. Inspired by Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/,
fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that
the approved verbiage exists in the specification.
Reviewed-by: Ro
