On 7/5/22 01:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
...
>>> Also i915 will run into trouble with attach. In particular since i915
>>> starts a full ww transaction in its attach callback to be able to lock
>>> other objects if migration is needed. I think i915 CI would catch this
>>> in a selftest.
>> Seems it
On 7/1/22 13:43, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 6/29/22 00:26, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote:
>> On 5/30/22 15:57, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> On 5/30/22 16:41, Christian König wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Am 30.05.22 um 15:26 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
> Hello Christian,
>
> On 5/30/22
On 6/29/22 00:26, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote:
>
> On 5/30/22 15:57, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 5/30/22 16:41, Christian König wrote:
>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>
>>> Am 30.05.22 um 15:26 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
Hello Christian,
On 5/30/22 09:50, Christian König wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
On 5/30/22 15:57, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
On 5/30/22 16:41, Christian König wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Am 30.05.22 um 15:26 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
Hello Christian,
On 5/30/22 09:50, Christian König wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
First of all please separate out this patch from the rest of the series,
since
On 5/30/22 16:41, Christian König wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Am 30.05.22 um 15:26 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
>> Hello Christian,
>>
>> On 5/30/22 09:50, Christian König wrote:
>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>
>>> First of all please separate out this patch from the rest of the series,
>>> since this is a complex
Hello Christian,
On 5/30/22 09:50, Christian König wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> First of all please separate out this patch from the rest of the series,
> since this is a complex separate structural change.
I assume all the patches will go via the DRM tree in the end since the
rest of the DRM
Hi Dmitry,
Am 30.05.22 um 15:26 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
Hello Christian,
On 5/30/22 09:50, Christian König wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
First of all please separate out this patch from the rest of the series,
since this is a complex separate structural change.
I assume all the patches will go via the
Hi Dmitry,
First of all please separate out this patch from the rest of the series,
since this is a complex separate structural change.
Am 27.05.22 um 01:50 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
All dma-bufs have dma-reservation lock that allows drivers to perform
exclusive operations over shared
All dma-bufs have dma-reservation lock that allows drivers to perform
exclusive operations over shared dma-bufs. Today's dma-buf API has
incomplete locking specification, which creates dead lock situation
for dma-buf importers and exporters that don't coordinate theirs locks.
This patch