Re: [RESEND RFC 04/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Call them time slots, not VCPI slots

2022-08-02 Thread Lyude Paul
> ; He Ying ; Matt Roper > > ; Sean Paul ; Hans > > Verkuil ; Fernando Ramos ; > > Javier Martinez Canillas ; open list > ker...@vger.kernel.org>; open list:INTEL DRM DRIVERS > g...@lists.freedesktop.org> > > Subject: [RESEND RFC 04/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Call

RE: [RESEND RFC 04/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Call them time slots, not VCPI slots

2022-06-14 Thread Lin, Wayne
er.kernel.org>; open list:INTEL DRM DRIVERS g...@lists.freedesktop.org> > Subject: [RESEND RFC 04/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Call them time slots, not > VCPI slots > > VCPI is only sort of the correct term here, originally the majority of this > code > simply referred to times

[RESEND RFC 04/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Call them time slots, not VCPI slots

2022-06-07 Thread Lyude Paul
VCPI is only sort of the correct term here, originally the majority of this code simply referred to timeslots vaguely as "slots" - and since I started working on it and adding atomic functionality, the name "VCPI slots" has been used to represent time slots. Now that we actually have consistent

[RFC 04/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Call them time slots, not VCPI slots

2022-06-07 Thread Lyude Paul
VCPI is only sort of the correct term here, originally the majority of this code simply referred to timeslots vaguely as "slots" - and since I started working on it and adding atomic functionality, the name "VCPI slots" has been used to represent time slots. Now that we actually have consistent