It occurred to me that we never actually check this! So let's start
doing that.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index b9374c981a5b..ebffb834f5d6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -3538,7 +3538,7 @@ drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_topology_state(struct 
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
                                       struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state 
*mst_state)
 {
        struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation *vcpi;
-       int avail_slots = 63, ret;
+       int avail_slots = 63, payload_count = 0, ret;
 
        /* There's no possible scenario where releasing VCPI or keeping it the
         * same would make the state invalid
@@ -3575,6 +3575,13 @@ drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_topology_state(struct 
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
                        goto port_fail;
                }
 
+               if (++payload_count > mgr->max_payloads) {
+                       DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST MGR:%p] state %p has too many 
payloads (max=%d)\n",
+                                        mgr, mst_state, mgr->max_payloads);
+                       ret = -EINVAL;
+                       goto port_fail;
+               }
+
                drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(vcpi->port);
        }
        DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST MGR:%p] mst state %p VCPI avail=%d used=%d\n",
-- 
2.19.2

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to