Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 11:09 AM
>>>> To: Russell, Kent ; Koenig, Christian
>>>> ; Kuehling, Felix ;
>>>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: allocate VM PDs/PTs on demand
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, same
ery time for me.
>>
>>Kent
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Christian König
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 11:09 AM
>>> To: Russell, Kent ; Koenig, Christian
>>> ; Kuehling, Felix ;
>>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>
e, so I ended
>> up
>> having to remove the libhsakmt package and pointing it to the folders
>> instead.
>>>
>>>Kent
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-
>>>> From: Koenig, Christian
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 201
al Message-
>>>> From: Kuehling, Felix
>>>> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2019 11:16 PM
>>>> To: Koenig, Christian ; Russell, Kent
>>>> ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: allocate VM PDs/PTs on demand
&g
nal Message-
>>> From: Kuehling, Felix
>>> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2019 11:16 PM
>>> To: Koenig, Christian ; Russell, Kent
>>> ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: allocate VM PDs/PTs on demand
>>>
>&
> ; Kuehling, Felix ;
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: allocate VM PDs/PTs on demand
>
> Yeah, same problem here.
>
> I removed libhsakmt package and installed it manually and now it seems to
> work.
>
> Doing some testing now, but
To: Russell, Kent ; Kuehling, Felix
; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: allocate VM PDs/PTs on demand
Yeah, the problem is I do have the libhsakmt installed.
Going to give it a try to specify the directory directly.
Christian.
Am 12.03.19 um 15:47 schrieb
istian
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 10:49 AM
> To: Russell, Kent ; Kuehling, Felix
> ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: allocate VM PDs/PTs on demand
>
> Yeah, the problem is I do have the libhsakmt installed.
>
> Going to give it
eb Russell, Kent:
>>>> From what I've been able to dig through, the VM Fault seems to occur
>>>> right after a doorbell mmap, but that's as far as I got. I can try to
>>>> revert it in today's merge and see how things go.
>>>>
>>>>
t ; Kuehling, Felix
> ; Koenig, Christian
> ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: allocate VM PDs/PTs on demand
>
> Hi guys,
>
> so found a few minutes today to compile kfdtest.
>
> Problem is that during the compile I get a lots
/amdgpu: allocate VM PDs/PTs on demand
My concerns were related to eviction fence handing. It would
manifest by
unnecessary eviction callbacks into KFD that aren't cause by real
evictions. I
addressed that with a previous patch series that removed the need to
remove eviction fences and add them
Message-
From: Kuehling, Felix
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2019 11:16 PM
To: Koenig, Christian ; Russell, Kent
; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: allocate VM PDs/PTs on demand
My concerns were related to eviction fence handing. It would manifest by
unnecessary eviction
11:16 PM
> To: Koenig, Christian ; Russell, Kent
> ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: allocate VM PDs/PTs on demand
>
> My concerns were related to eviction fence handing. It would manifest by
> unnecessary eviction callbacks into KFD that aren't
://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCT-Thunk-Interface
Regards,
Felix
-Original Message-
From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of Christian
König
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2019 9:14 AM
To: Russell, Kent ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: allocate VM PDs/PTs on demand
My best
That dmesg was from Fiji, but it occurred on Vega10 as well.
Kent
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian König
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2019 9:14 AM
> To: Russell, Kent ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: allocate VM PDs/PTs on dema
My best guess is that we forget somewhere to update the PDs. What
hardware is that on?
Felix already mentioned that this could be problematic for the KFD.
Maybe he has an idea,
Christian.
Am 08.03.19 um 15:04 schrieb Russell, Kent:
Hi Christian,
This patch ended up causing a VM Fault in
Hi Christian,
This patch ended up causing a VM Fault in KFDTest. Reverting just this patch
addressed the issue:
[ 82.703503] amdgpu :0c:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x480c for
process pid 0 thread pid 0
[ 82.703512] amdgpu :0c:00.0: VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR
17 matches
Mail list logo
