On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:42 PM, Zhu, Rex wrote:
>>Is this consistent with our other smu implementations? If we never use the
>>errors, I'm ok with removing them, but I don't want to have to add them again
>>later if we decide we
>>actually need them.
>
> Rex: until
>Is this consistent with our other smu implementations? If we never use the
>errors, I'm ok with removing them, but I don't want to have to add them again
>later if we decide we
>actually need them.
Rex: until vega10/raven, we do not handle the errors in windows/linux, just
print out the
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 5:46 AM, Rex Zhu wrote:
> In send_message_to_smu helper functions,
> Print out the error code for debug if smu failed to response.
>
> and the helper functions always return true, so no need to
> check their return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rex Zhu