On 2019-10-11 1:12 p.m., t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello, Daniel.
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:06:52PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
That's not the point I was making. For cpu cgroups there's a very well
defined connection between the cpu bitmasks/numbers in cgroups and the cpu
bitmasks you use in var
Hello, Daniel.
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:06:52PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> That's not the point I was making. For cpu cgroups there's a very well
> defined connection between the cpu bitmasks/numbers in cgroups and the cpu
> bitmasks you use in various system calls (they match). And that stuf
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:52 PM Greathouse, Joseph
wrote:
>
> > From: Daniel Vetter On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2019 11:07 AM
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 03:53:42PM +, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> > > On 2019-10-09 11:34, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 09,
> From: Daniel Vetter On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2019 11:07 AM
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 03:53:42PM +, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> > On 2019-10-09 11:34, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 03:25:22PM +, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> > >> On 2019-10-09
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 03:53:42PM +, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> On 2019-10-09 11:34, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 03:25:22PM +, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> >> On 2019-10-09 6:31, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 06:53:18PM +, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> >>
On 2019-10-09 11:34, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 03:25:22PM +, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
>> On 2019-10-09 6:31, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 06:53:18PM +, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
The description sounds reasonable to me and maps well to the CU masking
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 03:25:22PM +, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> On 2019-10-09 6:31, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 06:53:18PM +, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> >>
> >> The description sounds reasonable to me and maps well to the CU masking
> >> feature in our GPUs.
> >>
> >> It w
On 2019-10-09 6:31, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 06:53:18PM +, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
>>
>> The description sounds reasonable to me and maps well to the CU masking
>> feature in our GPUs.
>>
>> It would also allow us to do more coarse-grained masking for example to
>> guarante
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 11:08:45AM -0400, Kenny Ho wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Can you elaborate what you mean in more details? The goal of lgpu is
> to provide the ability to subdivide a GPU device and give those slices
> to different users as needed. I don't think there is anything
> controversial
Hi Daniel,
Can you elaborate what you mean in more details? The goal of lgpu is
to provide the ability to subdivide a GPU device and give those slices
to different users as needed. I don't think there is anything
controversial or vendor specific here as requests for this are well
documented. Th
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 06:53:18PM +, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> On 2019-08-29 2:05 a.m., Kenny Ho wrote:
> > drm.lgpu
> > A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on all cgroups.
> > Each entry is keyed by the DRM device's major:minor.
> >
> > lgpu stands for logica
On 2019-08-29 2:05 a.m., Kenny Ho wrote:
> drm.lgpu
> A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on all cgroups.
> Each entry is keyed by the DRM device's major:minor.
>
> lgpu stands for logical GPU, it is an abstraction used to
> subdivide a physical DRM devic
12 matches
Mail list logo
