On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:55 AM Arvind Sankar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:51:26PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 1:26 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:05:56AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > Hmmm...I would have liked to r
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:51:26PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 1:26 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:05:56AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > Hmmm...I would have liked to remove it outright, as it is an ABI
> > > mismatch that is likely to
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 1:26 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:05:56AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Hmmm...I would have liked to remove it outright, as it is an ABI
> > mismatch that is likely to result in instability and non-fun-to-debug
> > runtime issues in the future
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:05:56AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Hmmm...I would have liked to remove it outright, as it is an ABI
> mismatch that is likely to result in instability and non-fun-to-debug
> runtime issues in the future. I suspect my patch does work for GCC
> 7.1+. The question is
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:30 AM Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 2:07 PM Nick Desaulniers
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:19 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:08 AM S, Shirish wrote:
> > > > On 10/15/2019 3:52 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 2:07 PM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:19 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:08 AM S, Shirish wrote:
> > > On 10/15/2019 3:52 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> >
> > > My gcc build fails with below errors:
> > >
> > > dcn_calcs.c
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:05 AM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:19 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:08 AM S, Shirish wrote:
> > > On 10/15/2019 3:52 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> >
> > > My gcc build fails with below errors:
> > >
> > > dcn_calcs.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:19 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:08 AM S, Shirish wrote:
> > On 10/15/2019 3:52 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>
> > My gcc build fails with below errors:
> >
> > dcn_calcs.c:1:0: error: -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 is not between 4 and 12
> >
> > d
From: Arnd Bergmann
> Sent: 15 October 2019 08:19
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:08 AM S, Shirish wrote:
> > On 10/15/2019 3:52 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>
> > My gcc build fails with below errors:
> >
> > dcn_calcs.c:1:0: error: -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 is not between 4 and 12
> >
> > dcn_
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:08 AM S, Shirish wrote:
> On 10/15/2019 3:52 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> My gcc build fails with below errors:
>
> dcn_calcs.c:1:0: error: -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 is not between 4 and 12
>
> dcn_calc_math.c:1:0: error: -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 is not between 4
Hi Nick,
On 10/15/2019 3:52 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
Hello!
The x86 kernel is compiled with an 8B stack alignment via
`-mpreferred-stack-boundary=3` for GCC since 3.6-rc1 via
commit d9b0cde91c60 ("x86-64, gcc: Use
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 if supported")
or `-mstack-alignment=8
11 matches
Mail list logo