[TLDR: This mail in primarily relevant for Linux kernel regression
tracking. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]
On 14.07.23 04:50, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Anyway, I'm adding it to regzbot to ensure it doesn't fall through cracks
> unnoticed:
>
> #regzbot introduced: b39181f7c6907d
> h
Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting
for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
I still have this issue on my list of tracked regressions.
Was this fixed in between? Doesn't look like it from here, but I might
be missing something.
Ciao, Thorsten (wear
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 11:30:14 +0900
wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> >> index 897cf02c20b1..801f4414da3e 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> >> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_
Since the problem with enabling FTRACE_MCOUNT_MAX_OFFSET may be
test_for_valid_rec() returning wrong results, I made a small patch to
catch the result:
patch-test_for_valid_rec-printk.patch
diff -up ./kernel/trace/ftrace.c.ft ./kernel/trace/ftrace.c
--- ./kernel/trace/ftrace.c.ft
On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 20:55:06 +0900
wrote:
> So I tried to trap NULL and return:
>
> patch-drm_vblank_cancel_pending_works-printk-NULL-ret.patch
> diff -up ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank_work.c.pk2
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank_work.c
> --- ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank_work.c.pk2
rost...@goodmis.org sed in <20230717113623.41878...@gandalf.local.home>
>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 14:34:04 +0900
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Patch in
>> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217669#c4
>> > fixed the problem in freedesktop.org kernel 5.18.0-rc2 .
>> > This may explain that in kernel.o
rost...@goodmis.org sed in <20230717113623.41878...@gandalf.local.home>
>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 14:34:04 +0900
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Patch in
>> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217669#c4
>> > fixed the problem in freedesktop.org kernel 5.18.0-rc2 .
>> > This may explain that in kernel.o
On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 14:34:04 +0900
wrote:
> Patch in
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217669#c4
> fixed the problem in freedesktop.org kernel 5.18.0-rc2 .
> This may explain that in kernel.org tree, the said commit is in kernel-5.19.
You mean the patch that adds:
#if define
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:39:11 +0900
wrote:
> Yes, this is puzzling. That's why I need other people's opinion on this.
> Does it matter the DUT is a slow machine (Pentium 120MHz)?
>
Hmm, I wonder because the workqueue is running __init functions, could it
possibly be that it didn't finish before
rost...@goodmis.org sed in <20230714100019.6bf9b...@gandalf.local.home>
>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 14:34:04 +0900
>> wrote:
>>
>> > >> > So I'm confused about why it's mentioned. Was it backported?
>> > >>
>> > >> Taketo Kabe, could you please help to clean this confusion up? Did you
>> > >> mean
On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 14:34:04 +0900
wrote:
> >> > So I'm confused about why it's mentioned. Was it backported?
> >>
> >> Taketo Kabe, could you please help to clean this confusion up? Did you
> >> mean 5.19 in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217669#c5 ? And
> >> BTW: did you really
On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 09:50:17 +0700
Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it:
>
>
> See Bugzilla for the full thread and attached patches that fixes
> this regression.
>
> Later, when bisecting, the reporter got better kernel trace:
>
> > [
Thanks you all for getting attention to the report:
regressi...@leemhuis.info sed in
<55a3bbb1-5b3c-f454-b529-8ee9944cc...@leemhuis.info>
>> On 14.07.23 05:12, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 09:50:17 +0700
>> > Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> >
>> >> I notice a regression report on Bu
Hi,
I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it:
> Origin report: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2615
>
> Compile with CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=m on 32bit,
> kernel panics on radeon.ko load.
>
> On slow machine, there is 70 second window between
> login: prompt on ra
Thanks you all for getting attention to the report:
regressi...@leemhuis.info sed in
<55a3bbb1-5b3c-f454-b529-8ee9944cc...@leemhuis.info>
>> On 14.07.23 05:12, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 09:50:17 +0700
>> > Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> >
>> >> I notice a regression report on Bu
On 14.07.23 05:12, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 09:50:17 +0700
> Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>
>> I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it:
>>
>>
>> See Bugzilla for the full thread and attached patches that fixes
>> this regression.
>>
>> Later, when bisecting, the r
16 matches
Mail list logo
