Re: [Amforth] amforth-shell.py idea

2012-10-13 Thread Enoch
On 10/13/2012 02:53 PM, Matthias Trute wrote: > Hi, > >> We do still have a problem how to deal with hardware idiosyncrasies as >> timer0.frt demonstrates. It should not be dealt with through the shell >> (re my ill thought #py idea). >> >> The generic frt code should include some preprocessing in

Re: [Amforth] amforth-shell.py idea

2012-10-13 Thread Matthias Trute
Hi, > We do still have a problem how to deal with hardware idiosyncrasies as > timer0.frt demonstrates. It should not be dealt with through the shell > (re my ill thought #py idea). > > The generic frt code should include some preprocessing instructions to > produce MCU specific code, m4 perhaps?

Re: [Amforth] amforth-shell.py idea

2012-10-13 Thread Enoch
On 10/13/2012 11:29 AM, Matthias Trute wrote: > Hi, > >> What is your recommended practice? > > Very simple: Use what you like most. All tools > that I include with amforth are the ones I consider > useful for others as well. I do not enforce any of > them. > > The shell has a few advantages ove

Re: [Amforth] amforth-shell.py idea

2012-10-13 Thread Matthias Trute
Hi, > What is your recommended practice? Very simple: Use what you like most. All tools that I include with amforth are the ones I consider useful for others as well. I do not enforce any of them. The shell has a few advantages over a dumb terminal and I like to use it. YMMV. Matthias --