Matthias Trute writes:
> Hi Enoch,
>
> Only one remark so far.
>
> You defined the scope stack effect as ( addr len -- addr len wid )
> Usually forth follows the conecpt, that a word consumes its parameters
> to generate the new data. I'd prefer to keep this idea as the general
> design pattern.
Hi Enoch,
Only one remark so far.
You defined the scope stack effect as ( addr len -- addr len wid )
Usually forth follows the conecpt, that a word consumes its parameters
to generate the new data. I'd prefer to keep this idea as the general
design pattern. That changes scope to the stack effect
Matthias Trute writes:
> Hi Enoch,
>
> looks fine
>
> GIve me some more days to think about it (Im currently
> busy with other things) I find the sequence "(create) !e"
> sligthly strange. Your smudge change from an simple
> XT to WID-XT makes sense.
>
> Matthias
Hello Matthias,
I look forwa
