Matthias
I tried your suggesting but sliteral cannot be compiled into another
definition for some reason.
It is not found even though I can see it in my words list and I can '
sliteral . and it is found.
Is it on some non-default wordlist ?
Maybe a better question to ask is "Is there another wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Craig,
> I'm trying to create a label defining word which I would like to
> work as follows:
>
> xPos yPos s" this is the labels text" label: labelName
>
> I tried this code:
>
> \ Define a label that places itself : label:( x y
I'm trying to create a label defining word which I would like to work as
follows:
xPos yPos s" this is the labels text" label: labelName
I tried this code:
\ Define a label that places itself
: label:( x y addr count --- )
create
, , , ,
does>
dup over over
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> What's absolutely strange to me, is that definition of single word
> causes eeprom cells 2 and 3 to be rewritten 8 times (?!).
I just committed a change that should not write anything
to the EEPROM if nothing will change. In your example the
a
It seems, that I've found the problem leading to inappropriate
simulation of writing to the FLASH.
The patch for simavr, allowing to simulate amforth is available here:
https://groups.google.com/group/simavr/attach/e2ad4dc5abd1ef4/patch.txt?part=4&authuser=0&view=1
and description here:
https://g
Investigating the problem of the failed simulation of Amforth in simavr I have
added printing of every read and write operation to the FLASH and to the EEPROM.
Afterwards I've found, that when I define a very simple word:
> : test 12 ;
ok
>
It gives the following sequence of writes in the sim
