Hi Matthias,
Thank you for kind answers, I have to think twice before write...
Paolo
-Messaggio originale-
From: Matthias Trute
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 9:22 PM
To: Everything around amforth
Subject: Re: [Amforth] UM/MOD
> (ud u2) are 3-cells not 2, so I was wrong.
>
> Please forget
Hi Matthias,
yea, you both share Leon's code (in some stripped down version w/ FF), which is
neither amforth nor FF related. Otherwise the FF floating point follows the
other approach - it calls C math functions, and the current implementation of
that stuff comes from
https://github.com/igor-m/F
> (ud u2) are 3-cells not 2, so I was wrong.
>
> Please forget my previous message.
> There is no stack underflow raised.
There is no check whether there are enough data items on
the stack available. The stack underflow happens only
inside um/mod. The interpreter checks the stack only after
the
Am Donnerstag, den 28.05.2015, 23:56 +0200 schrieb pito:
> Hi, there is a "complete fp asm lib" for amforth at
> https://github.com/igor-m/Amforth-Floating-Point-in-ASM
Cool stuff
btw: flashforth from Mikael Nordman ported the FP code and it
runs now on a PIC as well. Thanks to the GPL (v3). We
s
Am Freitag, den 29.05.2015, 01:32 +0200 schrieb pito:
> Hi, I've seen your work in progress includes the for-next loop.
> I do not have amforth hw handy these days, but I would be interested to know
> what the amforth prints with
>
> : test 0 for i . next ;
It prints a lonely 0 . Under the hood
> Any updates I might have missed on the avra/native *NIX assembler for AVR?
> I see a bit of activity on the avr mailing list but I'm still getting the
> impression avra is out of date.
I think avra is a dead horse, not even a zombie any more. I tried
naken_asm, but could not make it work wit
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 29.05.2015, 13:01 +0200 schrieb Paolo Garro:
> Hello,
> the amforth reference guide says:
>
> um/mod ( ud u2 – rem quot) unsigned division ud / u2 with remainder
>
> so: two-numbers um/mod should leave two-numbers on the stack, remainder an
> quotient.
> This seems not to be
Dennis,
> You should link to my GitHub repository at
> https://github.com/DRuffer/coinForth rather than the older version of
> my paper.
>
>
> The newer version of that document is at coinForth/doc/ARD101/ARD101.pdf
Thanks for the update (and the nice work)
Matthias
---
Ops...
the reference was rigth:
um/mod ( ud u2 – rem quot) unsigned division ud / u2 with remainder
(ud u2) are 3-cells not 2, so I was wrong.
Please forget my previous message.
There is no stack underflow raised.
Paolo
---
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast anti
Hello,
the amforth reference guide says:
um/mod ( ud u2 – rem quot) unsigned division ud / u2 with remainder
so: two-numbers um/mod should leave two-numbers on the stack, remainder an
quotient.
This seems not to be true.
Here is a test session:
amforth 5.8 ATmega16
> depth . 0 ok
> $ 10 um/
10 matches
Mail list logo
