Hi Tristan,
> >
> > It would be a great contribution for the cookbook. Esp if it works
> > with
> > Forth code.
> This made me think that writing 4 or 5 assembler words was not the
> best way. Instead, have one assembler word wd! to perform the timed
> write to WDTCSR and then have forth words fo
Hello Matthias,
> IIRC only the "disable watchdog" sequence is timing critical (the
> 4 cpu cycles you mention). All other tasks can be performed at
> lower speed, so a forth implementation should be fine.
My atmega328p seems to require any change to WDTCSR to be completed
within 4 cycles (I have
