Re: [Amforth] Missing DU

2019-08-26 Thread Tristan Williams
Hello Martin, > Also, a bug in D0>: > Hmmm, something wrong here I feel: > > > (ATmega2560)> decimal 1553994000. d0> . 1572137999. d0> . > > -1 0 ok Yes, you are right. There is something odd with d0> It seems when the sign[1] of the least significant cell and the most significant cell

[Amforth] Missing DU

2019-08-26 Thread Martin Nicholas via Amforth-devel
Not present in 6.8 as far as I can see. > 8.6.2.1270 DU< “d-u-less” DOUBLE EXT > ( ud1 ud2 -- flag ) > flag is true if and only if ud1 is less than ud2. Also, a bug in D0>: Hmmm, something wrong here I feel: > (ATmega2560)> decimal 1553994000. d0> . 1572137999. d0> . > -1 0 ok Cheers!