Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-24 Thread Mark Roth
Here is the clean link. https://github.com/CableGuy67/avra On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 8:30 AM Mark Roth wrote: > > > > Talking of maintenance, I note that avra (on Sourceforge) hasn't been > >> > updated since 2019. Maybe it's completed? >> >> At least the home page points to https://github.com/Ro

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-24 Thread Mark Roth
> Talking of maintenance, I note that avra (on Sourceforge) hasn't been > > updated since 2019. Maybe it's completed? > > At least the home page points to https://github.com/Ro5bert/avra which > has seen some commits since 2019. > There were some PRs for that one that led to a development branch

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-24 Thread Malte Frank Gerdes
Martin Nicholas via Amforth-devel writes: > On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 17:04:01 +0200 > tristan wrote: > >> Fellow AmForth-ers, >> >> Perhaps it is time again to consider having a formal maintainer for >> AmForth. Back in May 2022 Erich stepped down [1] and put in place >> various resources that coul

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-24 Thread Martin Nicholas via Amforth-devel
On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 17:04:01 +0200 tristan wrote: > Fellow AmForth-ers, > > Perhaps it is time again to consider having a formal maintainer for > AmForth. Back in May 2022 Erich stepped down [1] and put in place > various resources that could be potentially be used to maintain > AmForth (in addi

Re: [Amforth] Maintainer(s) for AmForth

2023-09-24 Thread tristan
Hello Mark and fellow AmForth'ers, I am guessing you mean the SourceForge repo and the mailing list? Yes, my primary focus is the SF AmForth repo, website, community and mailing list. The fact is that this project is still useful. I completely agree. AmForth is quite special as an embedded