Hi,
> Amforth introduces the e-addr and f-addr concepts to match the AVR arch.
>
> I think that it is worth mentioning that f-addr is word based and there
> is no subtype to it.
>
> That is unlike the data space relationship (quoting forth-rc1 page 22):
> a-addr ⇒ c-addr ⇒ addr ⇒ u;
http://amf
Hello Matthias & all,
Just a quick doc comment.
Amforth introduces the e-addr and f-addr concepts to match the AVR arch.
I think that it is worth mentioning that f-addr is word based and there
is no subtype to it.
That is unlike the data space relationship (quoting forth-rc1 page 22):
a-addr ⇒
