Hi David,
> Just noticed something with the @i word with addressing.
>
>
>> : strng s" ABCDEFGHIJKLM" ;
>
> ok
>
>> ' strng 3 + @i .
>
> 4241 ok
>
>> ' strng 4 + @i .
>
> 4443 ok
>
>> ' strng 5 + @i .
>
> 4645 ok
>
>>
>
>
> It looks like there is an implied 'cells' when using @i. Is this correct?
Just noticed something with the @i word with addressing.
> : strng s" ABCDEFGHIJKLM" ;
ok
> ' strng 3 + @i .
4241 ok
> ' strng 4 + @i .
4443 ok
> ' strng 5 + @i .
4645 ok
>
It looks like there is an implied 'cells' when using @i. Is this correct?
(what I actually want is c@i - i.e. rea
