-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Shadow Enoch,
On 05/05/2014 09:09 PM, Enoch wrote:
> All,
>
> I know that the above subject line is a red flag to some but to others
> it is a vital commercial concern to understand where the border line
> passes.
>
> On this subject I wrote i
Andreas Wagner
writes:
> From the GPLv2 license text ( http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html ):
>
> "The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making
> modifications to it."
>
> Because you are not editing the obfuscated code directly, this would still
> be a violatio
From the GPLv2 license text ( http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html ):
"The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making
modifications to it."
Because you are not editing the obfuscated code directly, this would still
be a violation of the GPLv2.
On Mon, May 5, 2
All,
I know that the above subject line is a red flag to some but to others
it is a vital commercial concern to understand where the border line
passes.
On this subject I wrote in amforth-shadow github:
Matthias Trute, AmForth creator, believes that its GPLv2 license means
that users are entitle
