Hello itmwh,
My memory of other TA packages is fading but doesn't Ami have some
superior trading orientated features:
- dynamically reference range used by formulas via charts;
- reference studies in formula e.g. resistance line drawn on chart;
- multitab chart sheets;
- customise toolbar button
; point and figure, eqivolume?
BrianB2
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "wavemechanic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "brian.z123" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 8:47 PM
>
gt; - Original Message -
> From: "brian.z123" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 11:57 PM
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is
charting
>
>
>
> > It will be interesting to see what people
:
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 11:57 PM
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is
charting
>
>
>
> > It will be interesting to see what people add to the *list* regarding
> > ease of use, quality and studies.
>
> I don't
nal Message -
> From: "brian.z123" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 8:47 PM
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is
charting
>
>
> > Hello itmwh,
> >
> > My memory of other TA p
om, "wavemechanic" wrote:
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: "brian.z123"
> >> To:
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 11:57 PM
> >> Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is
>
on back
> > in 2003:
> >
> > http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/49871
> >
> > And while any number of studies can be coded in AFL, these really
> > don't compare to the speed and convenience of (well written)
> > integrated solu
end software packages. I use what I have to in order to
> survive.
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -
> > From: "brian.z123"
> > To:
> > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 11:57 PM
> > Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amib
red, semi-retired or have a full-time job. Do this for a
living
> and you won't compromise. You'll find what you need to best help
> you make $$$.
>
> I don't defend software packages. I use what I have to in order to
> survive.
>
>
> > ----- Origi
Just adding to the opinions here, I think AB is the king of
backtesting and programming but I have to agree that it lacks when
comes to charting... and I'm not talking about indicators, I'm
talking about "charting, quality, graphics, etc" ... I've brought
this issue up many times but noone seem
Hello Trading Humble,
I am not having a go at you or pushing any agenda; I am trying to
understand what the chartists want for my own reasons
(if they are using charts in a way that I am not and it is
contributing to their trading success I want to know about it).
The problem is no-one can spec
I think Amibrokers Charting is very good. (I have used many other
platforms)
I agree with the other posters here.
Please advise what is missing in your opinion.
Thomasz will likely advise you on how to adjust your settings to
duplicate whatever you are looking for, or possbly add what is
lacki
TED]>
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 8:31 AM
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is
charting
>
>
> > Hello Trading Humble,
> >
> > I am not having a go at you or pushing any agenda; I am trying to
> > understand
t; > Brian:
> >
> > If you are really interested in using charting techniques, have
you
> considered looking at some of the programs, including those
mentioned
> in previous messages, on a trial basis?
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message
>
> > If you are really interested in using charting techniques, have you
> considered looking at some of the programs, including those mentioned
> in previous messages, on a trial basis?
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> &
s.com , "brian.z123" wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Fair enough.
> > > >
> > > > A few minutes at the website doesn't equal a trial.
> > > >
> > > > I will take the Ensign trial when I get a chance an
Thanks to all. Some good posts. You've shaken the monkey out of the
tree for me know.
BrianB2.
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "itmwh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think amibroker as a system developing/backtesting/automatic
> excecution software is superb, actually, in my opinion, best i
Thanks Gordon. I might try to fix it up to make it look more like the
one at Stockcharts -- with color differentciation about the zero line
-- and re-release it.
I tend to forget about all the on-line AB resources available and
don't always look there when I should.
Dan
--- In amibroker@yahoogro
- Original Message -
From: "brian.z123" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 8:47 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is charting
> Hello itmwh,
>
> My memory of other TA packages is fading but doesn&#x
- Original Message -
From: "brian.z123" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 11:57 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is charting
> It will be interesting to see what people add to the *list* regarding
> ea
x27;t compare to the speed and convenience of (well written)
integrated solutions.
-Joe
> --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "wavemechanic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "brian.z123" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
AM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is charting
- Original Message -
From: "brian.z123" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 8:47 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is char
: Re: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is
charting
- Original Message -
From: "brian.z123" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
To: < amibroker@yahoogroups.com <mailto:amibroker@yahoogroups.com> >
Sent: Thursday, February 15,
day, February 18, 2007 8:31 AM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is charting
> Hello Trading Humble,
>
> I am not having a go at you or pushing any agenda; I am trying to
> understand what the chartists want for my own reasons
> (if they are using charts i
- Original Message -
From: "brian.z123" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 5:33 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is charting
>
> Fair enough.
>
> A few minutes at the website doesn't equal a t
t; *Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 5:33 PM*
> *Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is
> charting*
> *
> *
> *>
> > Fair enough.
> >
> > A few minutes at the website doesn't equal a trial.
> >
> > I will take the En
Hi Michael,
> Great, you have learned a valuable lesson.
Okay, then I'll never do it again.
>>> No.
>> But doesn't that make it more convenient and easier to read?
> Not really.
Is it a good idea to top post?
Yuki
Monday, February 19, 2007, 10:36:32 AM, you wrote:
MSG> Two words:
MSG
Millowena
- Original Message -
From: "brian.z123" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 8:31 AM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is charting
> Hello Trading Humble,
>
> I am not having a go at you or pushing any
> considered looking at some of the programs, including those mentioned
> in previous messages, on a trial basis?
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "brian.z123"
> > To:
> > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 8:31
Monday, February 19, 2007 9:38 AM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is charting
> If you want additional studies, Tomasz has already indicated if you
> submit them as feature requests, they will be considered for
> implementation as part of the A
ps.com, "wavemechanic" wrote:
> > >
> > > Brian:
> > >
> > > If you are really interested in using charting techniques, have you
> > considered looking at some of the programs, including those mentioned
> > in previous messages, on a trial
: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is charting
If you want additional studies, Tomasz has already indicated if you
submit them as feature requests, they will be considered for
implementation as part of the AB package. Here is the link with his
offer: http://finance.groups.yahoo.com
Hi,
I used to think split posting was good. But now I can't stand it.
I spend more time trying to distinguish between Original content and New
content than reading
the actual information provided! And when a thread is continued, It just
ends up a big mess.
The idea of resending the original cont
33 matches
Mail list logo
