[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change ameritrade

2008-05-12 Thread nickhere
> > their feed. > > > > A solution that covers Broker Feed>MedVed QT---> > AmiBroker > > > can cover > > > > the needs of a large portion of the universe of AB clients. I > know > > > this > > > > route already exist

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread brian_z111
to year. > > > > _ > > From: amibroker@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of cstrader > Sent: Thursday, 13 March 2008 12:26 PM > To: amibroker@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change >

RE: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread Paul Ho
@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change Yes, completely silly as we can trade FUTURES contracts at many brokerages with only $2K. What the heck are they thinking? - Original Message - From: "Yuki Taga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread brian_z111
ko" > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:14 PM > Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change > > > > Hi Tomasz, > > > > TJ> US securities regulations require at least USD 25,000 (or USD > > equivalent) in equity to day tr

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread brian_z111
gt; that is why it is non-issue for traders. > > > > > > If someone has less than $25K, better forget about daytrading. > > > > > > US IRA accounts are another story, but as I wrote Daniel, IRA- style delayed clearance > > > is on to-do lis

Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread cstrader
ubject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change > Hi Tomasz, > > TJ> US securities regulations require at least USD 25,000 (or USD > equivalent) in equity to day trade. > > I always thought this was a silly little "looks like we are > protecting the littl

Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread Tomasz Janeczko
Janeczko amibroker.com - Original Message - From: Herman To: Tomasz Janeczko Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 1:35 AM Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change Re: > If someone has less than $25K, better forget about daytrading. It is no

Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread Yuki Taga
Hi Tomasz, TJ> US securities regulations require at least USD 25,000 (or USD equivalent) in equity to day trade. I always thought this was a silly little "looks like we are protecting the little guys" kind of law. So, somebody without very much cash is prohibited from repeatedly wagering (and le

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread brian_z111
SD equivalent) in equity to day trade. US IRA accounts are never allowed > to borrow cash (have a debit balance) in a Reg T Margin account. > > > > Best regards, > Tomasz Janeczko > amibroker.com > - Original Message ----- > From: "brian_z111" <[EMAIL

Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread Tomasz Janeczko
count. Best regards, Tomasz Janeczko amibroker.com - Original Message - From: "brian_z111" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:32 AM Subject: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change > Yes, that is why I posted on the subject. &g

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread brian_z111
ems to have happened to TJ in this instance. Ron D > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Tomasz Janeczko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:01 AM > Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Inte

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread brian_z111
Janeczko > amibroker.com > - Original Message ----- > From: "brian_z111" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:51 PM > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change > > > >> I'm glad to see someone

Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread Tomasz Janeczko
accounts are another story, but as I wrote Daniel, IRA-style delayed clearance is on to-do list. Best regards, Tomasz Janeczko amibroker.com - Original Message - From: "brian_z111" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:51 PM Subject: [amibroker] R

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread brian_z111
> I'm glad to see someone else mention the t+3 clearance issue. I'm amazed that it never seems to get a mention. Sadly I can't see that any daytrader could or would use AB as a trading platform (unless they have AB >> QT >> a broker other than AB. I guess they use AB for backtesting and go to a

Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread Ronald Davis
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:01 AM Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change >> As i am one of the seven out of thousands, who are willing to support >> you, even without knowing what they will get, i think it is not good >> style to be that ins

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread danielwardadams
I'm glad to see someone else mention the t+3 clearance issue. I primarily trade in IRAs in which the use of margin isn't allowed. Consequently, I always have to wait the 3 day settlement time before my funds from a long sell (can't short in IRAs either) are available to trade again. In "Cash" a

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread rhoemke
perly. > > Best regards, > Tomasz Janeczko > amibroker.com > - Original Message - > From: "rhoemke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:22 PM > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change >

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread imresident2001
I know lots of people want their brokers supported. but in my opinion Thomasz should pick top 2 or 3 american brokers along with interactive brokers and develop plugins for all of them for a reasonable price as a bundle. I think that makes the best business sense in the long run. Its going to i

Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread Tomasz Janeczko
]> To: Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:22 PM Subject: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change > You definitely misunderstand my posting. > Maybe you better read it again. > > I did not want my donation back. You promised something else. I quoted > your email r

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread rhoemke
you are right. Maybe i have to point out what i call insolent. I never never never wanted the donation back. What i found insolent was, that Tomasz offered to pay back the donation after mentioning his unkept promise. Regards Robert --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "brian_z111" <[EMAIL PROTECTE

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread brian_z111
Robert, Intially you had my respect for (porlitely) speaking on a matter of honour. In the end you tarnished that a little because Tomasz had already (without hesitation) redressed the issue. Your final post was motivated by something other than honour. No good ever comes from an act without

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread rhoemke
;rhoemke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:50 AM > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change > > > > Hello, > > i did not forget, that it was a donation. > > But i did also not forget, that there was

RE: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread Richard Dale
st send a request to support. Best regards, Tomasz Janeczko amibroker.com - Original Message - From: "rhoemke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:robert%40hoemke.de> > To: mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 8:55 AM Subject: [amibroker] R

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread brian_z111
Herman, >I wish all that time that goes into plugin development and maintenance >would go into AmiBroker development. I have already accepted that the day will probably come when I have to pay someone to write a plugin > broker API for me so I am not jsut pushing my own barrow. To me I see t

Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread Tomasz Janeczko
Refund processed. You have your donation back. Best regards, Tomasz Janeczko amibroker.com > - Original Message - > From: "rhoemke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:50 AM > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plug

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread brian_z111
improvement. If memory serves me right TJ had stated earlier > > this was > > > something that he would get down to one of these days. Maybe the > > time has > > > come now?? > > > > > > Rakesh > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 7:22 AM, wave

Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread Tomasz Janeczko
- From: "rhoemke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:50 AM Subject: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change > Hello, > i did not forget, that it was a donation. > But i did also not forget, that there was a promise. > > See her

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread rhoemke
Hello, i did not forget, that it was a donation. But i did also not forget, that there was a promise. See here: Hello again, I forgot one thing - soon you will receive individual key code to be used with NEXT version of IBController that will enable some extras for registered IBC users. Best re

RE: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread Richard Dale
st send a request to support. Best regards, Tomasz Janeczko amibroker.com - Original Message - From: "rhoemke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:robert%40hoemke.de> > To: mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 8:55 AM Subject: [amibroker] Re: Inte

Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread Tomasz Janeczko
neczko amibroker.com - Original Message - From: "rhoemke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 8:55 AM Subject: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change > Hello Thomasz, > > some time ago you gave people the possibility to sp

Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread Rakesh Sahgal
:22 AM, wavemechanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > *Fidelity should be in the same boat. Another biggie.* > > > ** > > > *Bill* > > > ** > > > *- Original Message - * *From: "Tomasz Janeczko" <** > > >

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread rhoemke
Hello Tomasz, how much would you estimate for the subscription cost? Best regards --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Tomasz Janeczko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > Due to enormous time required to maintain IB plugin because of very frequent changes > often breaking backward compatib

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-12 Thread rhoemke
Hello Thomasz, some time ago you gave people the possibility to spend money for development of IBc. Those who spent money should have additional features in the new version. Nothing ever happened. No new version, not even an answer when i asked for an ETA of a new version. Hopefully this will not

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-11 Thread brian_z111
PROTECTED]>*>* > > *To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] *>* > > *Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 7:07 PM* > > *Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change* > > * > > * > > *>>>How about making a ameritrade plugin and charging money f

Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-11 Thread Rakesh Sahgal
boat. Another biggie.* > ** > *Bill* > ** > *- Original Message - * *From: "Tomasz Janeczko" <** > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*>* > *To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] *>* > *Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 7:07 PM* > *Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re

Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-11 Thread wavemechanic
Fidelity should be in the same boat. Another biggie. Bill - Original Message - From: "Tomasz Janeczko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 7:07 PM Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change >>>How about makin

RE: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-11 Thread Jerry Gress
: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change >>How about making a ameritrade plugin and charging money for it too. > Ameritrade is the biggest retail broker and I bet you would get lots > more new customers. Looked at their site. They seem to have an API, so technically it seems poss

Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-11 Thread Tomasz Janeczko
>>How about making a ameritrade plugin and charging money for it too. > Ameritrade is the biggest retail broker and I bet you would get lots > more new customers. Looked at their site. They seem to have an API, so technically it seems possible. I will investigate it further. Best regards, Toma

[amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change

2008-03-11 Thread imresident2001
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Tomasz Janeczko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >How about making a ameritrade plugin and charging money for it too. Ameritrade is the biggest retail broker and I bet you would get lots more new customers. > Hello, > > Due to enormous time required to maintain IB p