Hey Bob,
What be you asking for the Apache and a Mohawk? Manassas is a stone's throw
from my place here in central PA.
Mike(y)
W3SLK
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Heathkit Apache(s)
Greg,
I am
Hi Bob,
What kind of shape are the Apaches in, especially the modified one? Do you
have any idea of a price you would accept for either.
You can email back or call any time, 703-978-6200, I never hit the sack b4
midnight, usually later! I am over here in Beautiful Downtown Burke.
73,
John,
Greg,
I am located in Manassas, VA. It is about 35 miles West of Washington,
DC.
Be careful how you start "twisting" my arm. I have relatives in the
Atlanta, Acworth, & Rome areas of GA!!
I also have two Mohawks - non modified, and at least one of each
original manuals.
Offers
Where are you located Bob ??
73, Greg KX4R
NW Georgia
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "AM Radio"
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 5:30 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] Heathkit Apache(s)
> I have two Heathkit Apaches I'd like to sell. One has had the W3SCC/W3YGC
> audio modif
We have a substantial hobby in exploration, restoration and use of vintage
analog equipment and, IHMO, there isn't any reasonable excuse for
arbitrarily terminating this interest.
I don't know what has been discussed on other reflectors, but giving the
ARRL the benefit of the doubt, there are issu
Recently on another reflector I read a rumor about the ARRL proposing a maximum
bandwidth limitation on subbands of 3.5 Kcy. I sent the following message to
the Executive Director of the ARRL and here is his answer. I post for you
consumption. Is it time to get involved with the directors?
7
I have two Heathkit Apaches I'd like to sell. One has had the W3SCC/W3YGC
audio modifications done to it, plus feedback added. The other is not
modified, but the final fan motor is bad.
Will drive some distance to meet, won't try to ship. There is too much mass
on the back side of the chassis.
Don...Talked with Jim Haynie yesterday about this.Like he said and
please do not quote me that they have not told him what to
petition the FCC on and that there has not been a time frame set to do
it...I really do not think that he is in favor
after he saw all the interest in
Minute 64 adopted at the most recent
ARRL Board of Directors meeting on July 19-20, 2002:
http://www.arrl.org/announce/board-0207/
64. On motion of Mr. Frenaye, seconded by Mr. Stinson, it was VOTED that at
the next practical opportunity the ARRL shall petition the FCC to revise
Part 97 to re
9 matches
Mail list logo
