Re: [AMRadio] Frequency Response

2004-09-25 Thread Gary Blau
IMHO, the best approach is to terminate the mod xfmr (or any audio xfmr) for best transient (square ware) response of the modulated envelope, not just an arbitrary upper frequency. Adjust for best stability, least overshoot and ringing on leading edges, and the least tilt. Check it at mid freq's,

Re: [AMRadio] Frequency Response

2004-09-25 Thread Crawfish
The phone company is responsible for that illogical 3 kHz upper limit. The consonant sounds are missing unless you go above 4.4 kHz( 5 kHz is a good compromise). Joe W4AAB - Original Message - From: Gary Blau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Discussion of AM Radio amradio@mailman.qth.net Sent:

Re: [AMRadio] Frequency Response

2004-09-25 Thread Byron Lichtenwalner
Gary I have read several of your writings that refers to tilt. What is it, or where can I go to learn more about it? Byron W3WKR

RE: [AMRadio] Frequency Response

2004-09-25 Thread Jim Candela
I have always admired what Don has done with his modulation system. That 3400 hertz brick wall filter is a rarity unless one uses high technology active circuitry such as active op-amps, switched capacitor filters, dsp, etc. I believe Don has a passive module that does a great job. I wonder

Re: [AMRadio] Frequency Response

2004-09-25 Thread Edward B Richards
What about bandwidth? +/- 5kc would be a 10 kc band width. I thought we were supposed to limit our band width to 6kc. Please correct me if I am wrong. 73, Ed Richards K6UUZ On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:37:25 -0500 Crawfish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The phone company is responsible for that illogical

Re: [AMRadio] Frequency Response

2004-09-25 Thread Crawfish
If you listen around on AM much, there are very few 6 kHz signals, just like SSB. I hear lots of the SSB boys wider than 6 KHz.I don't believe that is according to the rules, but then, unless someone is being a real pain in the neck, the FCC isn't going to start measuring bandwidth.They have more

Re: [AMRadio] Frequency Response

2004-09-25 Thread Jim Candela
Ed, You make a good point. I do however need to bring up that bandwidth needs to be specified with a certain roll off in DB. For example a mechanical filter in a receiver is often specified at -6, and -60 db and with a certain shape factor. A clean AM ham rig may be 30 Khz wide at the

Re: [AMRadio] Frequency Response

2004-09-25 Thread Edward B Richards
Hi Jim; For the 55 years I have been in electronics, bandwidth has always been defined as the half voltage points (-6dB). We all know that band passes don't have vertical sides. Therefore it will be narrower above the -6 dB points and wider below. Thanks for your input. 73, Ed Richards K6UUZ

Re: [AMRadio] Frequency Response

2004-09-25 Thread peter A Markavage
How you interpret the rules or who you believe on the air is always confusing, so here's the FCC's present rules on emission and bandwidth: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/get-cfr.cgi?TITLE=47PART=2SECTI ON=202YEAR=2001TYPE=TEXT Here's FCC's General Rules and Regulations:

[AMRadio] (no subject)

2004-09-25 Thread John Coleman
OPPS I sent this via the wrong EMAIL again. I'm sorry Here it is via the proper email ** This is the Official notice for the 2nd annual - WA5BXO BBQ to be held on Halloween day, Sunday Oct 31, 2004 See The link below