Jose HF Silva wrote:
Hi ALL,
I wonder why it is beeing mostly mentioned 75m, when
in fact it is supposed to be 80m?
The (old) sets and books and tables and slang were
always referring 80m band (3.5 - 3.8 MHz).
The 75m correspond to 4.0 MHz: is this a new band or a
new trend?
Thanks for clari
Jose-
Hi and good evening.
Thanks for asking a good question about 75/80 meters.
--- Jose HF Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The (old) sets and books and tables and slang were
> always referring 80m band (3.5 - 3.8 MHz).
You are certainly correct here. The lower portion of
the band does re
Hi ALL,
I wonder why it is beeing mostly mentioned 75m, when
in fact it is supposed to be 80m?
The (old) sets and books and tables and slang were
always referring 80m band (3.5 - 3.8 MHz).
The 75m correspond to 4.0 MHz: is this a new band or a
new trend?
Thanks for clarification on this :-)
73
3 matches
Mail list logo