Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-09 Thread Jim Wilhite
Hope you get it Ken, it will help. For an all around transmitter, the DX 100 is one of the simplest and best. Quality of parts is unparalled and if the construction is proper it will last a long time if care is taken. I hope to contact you some day too. Listen on 10 AM, in the late afterno

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-09 Thread Ken Zuercher
Jim, "The more work you put into the antenna the better the payoff no matter what the transmitter." Truer words have never been spoken! My lot is 48X108ft. I do have a Hygain vertical and a MiniQuad that may get put back into service. I used to run QRP with the vertical on 80-10 meters with a He

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-05 Thread alsan19420
My HW-16 still goes well with only 25 watts. Al Perkins KA1KIX -- From: "Ellen Rugowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 5:42 AM To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Subject: Re: [AM

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-05 Thread Jim Wilhite
Hi Ken, How much space do you have? If your tower is 50-60 ft. could you possibly install an Inverted L? Say 55 ft vertical (the more the better) with the rest horizontal out to about 160-170 ft and the end as high as possible. Feed that with 50 ohm coax and use a series cap in the center

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-05 Thread Ellen Rugowski
ssage - From: "Ken Zuercher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:59 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m > I have a Heath DX-40 which is more > than enough for any cw contact but I haven't don

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-04 Thread Ken Zuercher
Jim, If I had a little more land, I'd put up dipoles also. I am however using half slopers on 40,20, and 10 meters. the longest is only 32 feet. The 40 meter unit tunes well on 15 also. i haven't worked anyone on 15 as I haven't been around when the band is open. I am just about able to put up a 75

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-03 Thread Jim Wilhite
No cable where I have lived in the past 10 years. I have been in rural areas and there may be only two or three houses near me. No only that but we don't watch enough TV to put an antenna on the tower. My poles are used in conjunction with the tower to support dipoles. I like dipoles better

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-03 Thread Ken Zuercher
Why don't you get cable like any intelligent person? (LOL) I don't have cable I use the 55 foot tower to hold up ham antennas and a good TV antenna, keeps my wife happy. My neighbors think i'm Amish (or just cheap). I am the latter. Ken, KC8QO --- Jim Wilhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is ama

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-02 Thread Jim Wilhite
It is amazing what putting poles or towers in the air gather. Over the years I have moved several times and when I installed the tower neighbors all wanted to know what that thing at the top was. I finally wised up and told them it was just a special TV antenna so I could watch stations in th

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-02 Thread Larry Szendrei
From: "M. K. Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi folks, > > I love AM, and 160m .. Does anyone operate AM on 160m, and where can I find > you? > I've spent a few nites scanning 160, and it seems unusual that I can't find > any AM signals! > > Where are you hanging out? > > Regards, > > Mike - N3EAQ >

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-02 Thread Peter Markavage
My neighbors love me (cough). For years they though my hobby was climbing up on my roof and sticking metal poles in the air. Pete, wa2cwa www.manualman.com On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 09:56:44 -0700 "Bob Macklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Because I am still working on getting the new antenna up. The f

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-02 Thread Ellen Rugowski
I had a blast working Jim, W5JO on 10m AM this last Friday night. 73, Ellen - AF9J Peter Markavage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And, of course, there's always 20, 15, 10, and 6 meters to working those AM'ers well beyond the horizon. Pete, wa2cwa www.manualman.com _

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-02 Thread Bob Macklin
mmented that "I HAVE A LOT OF STUFF HERE"! Told her that's not what my wife called it. Bob Macklin K5MYJ Seattle, Wa, "Real Radios Glow in the Dark" - Original Message - From: "Peter Markavage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 9

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-02 Thread Peter Markavage
I guess one have to ask; why don't you make(start) your own activity? Calling CQ is still in vogue. If everyone sits around and waits for activity, that's a poor use of the spectrum. Pete, wa2cwa www.manualman.com On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 08:20:40 -0700 "Bob Macklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I ha

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-02 Thread Bob Macklin
From: "Peter Markavage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 8:08 AM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m > I heard several AM QSO's this past weekend around 14.286. Also heard some > AM activity on 10 meters (several stations) and one AM QSO (4 land to 9

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-02 Thread Peter Markavage
I heard several AM QSO's this past weekend around 14.286. Also heard some AM activity on 10 meters (several stations) and one AM QSO (4 land to 9 land) on 6 meters. There is AM life beyond 75 and/or 160 meters. Pete, wa2cwa www.manualman.com On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 07:48:36 -0700 "Bob Macklin" <[EMAIL

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-02 Thread Todd, KA1KAQ
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Peter Markavage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And, of course, there's always 20, 15, 10, and 6 meters to working those > AM'ers well beyond the horizon. Yes indeed, without the 'big' antenna issues. Fired up the Clegg station over the weekend Pete, no ant presently

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-02 Thread Bob Macklin
, 2008 7:35 AM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m > And, of course, there's always 20, 15, 10, and 6 meters to working those > AM'ers well beyond the horizon. > > Pete, wa2cwa > www.manualman.com > > On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 09:25:11 -0400 "Todd, KA1KAQ" <[EMAIL

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-02 Thread Peter Markavage
And, of course, there's always 20, 15, 10, and 6 meters to working those AM'ers well beyond the horizon. Pete, wa2cwa www.manualman.com On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 09:25:11 -0400 "Todd, KA1KAQ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Jim Wilhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-02 Thread Todd, KA1KAQ
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Jim Wilhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Most stations are on 1885, 1915,1980 and 1985 depending on QRM. You might > catch someone but the chances are rare. See you next fall. Have also heard stations on 1945 with some regularity over the last few winters. 1885/

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-02 Thread Tim Kass
Also try 1936 khz 73, Tim K8WBL Jim Wilhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mike, most 160 AM people have gone into hibernation for the summer. Next fall when the atmospheric noise subsides, they will return. Most stations are on 1885, 1915,1980 and 1985 depending on QRM. You might cat

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-01 Thread Jim Wilhite
Mike, most 160 AM people have gone into hibernation for the summer. Next fall when the atmospheric noise subsides, they will return. Most stations are on 1885, 1915,1980 and 1985 depending on QRM. You might catch someone but the chances are rare. See you next fall. 73 Jim/W5JO - Orig

Re: [AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-01 Thread Mike Sawyer
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 10:51 PM Subject: [AMRadio] AM on 160m Hi folks, I love AM, and 160m .. Does anyone operate AM on 160m, and where can I find you? I've spent a few nites scanning 160, and it seems unusual that I can't find any AM signals! Where

[AMRadio] AM on 160m

2008-06-01 Thread M. K. Hess
Hi folks, I love AM, and 160m .. Does anyone operate AM on 160m, and where can I find you? I've spent a few nites scanning 160, and it seems unusual that I can't find any AM signals! Where are you hanging out? Regards, Mike - N3EAQ _