The League doesn't have to do everything my, way of course, - I was
just holding the organization up to the standard of my imaginary
"perfect organization". A friend of mine offered an excellent
explanation of why the change, why the ARRL zeroed-in on just the ham
bands in the fight against
At 10:38 AM 7/19/2008, you wrote:
Kim wrote:
This is simply an unfair assertion. It is not the ARRL's job to be
the Omniscient Spectrum Protector. Most of the spectrum is not the
Amateur's to protect.
I disagree. I asserted that the League has changed its role, and
speculated on reasons th
Excellent response Kim. I also agree that, as a member of the ARRL, I
want the ARRL to focus their resources, energies, and monies in
protecting the amateur radio spectrum. If the FCC wants to trash the
rest of the usable spectrum with BPL, including those used by other
agencies in their family,
Kim wrote:
This is simply an unfair assertion. It is not the ARRL's job to be
the Omniscient Spectrum Protector. Most of the spectrum is not the
Amateur's to protect.
I disagree. I asserted that the League has changed its role, and
speculated on reasons that might have happened - not that t
In a message dated 7/18/2008 10:26:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Steve WD8DAS
writes:
>i find it very interesting how the ARRL has changed the nature of their
>
>
>It started out as a worthy fight against yet another RFI problem from
>devices that aren't supposed to radiate. Over time their
At 09:49 PM 7/18/2008, Kim Elmore wrote:
This is simply an unfair assertion. It is not the ARRL's job to be
the Omniscient Spectrum Protector. Most of the spectrum is not the
Amateur's to protect. If the Government allows an activity that
trashes its own spectrum, it's their problem, not the AR
This is simply an unfair assertion. It is not the ARRL's job to be
the Omniscient Spectrum Protector. Most of the spectrum is not the
Amateur's to protect. If the Government allows an activity that
trashes its own spectrum, it's their problem, not the ARRL's. If the
Government allows activity t
I find it very interesting how the ARRL has changed the nature of their
challenge to BPL.
It started out as a worthy fight against yet another RFI problem from
devices that aren't supposed to radiate. Over time their effort has
"morphed" into a drive to get BPL operators to notch out the ha
I know that I will get hit upside the head but to you guys that say ARRL
does nothing for Ham Radio Read on!!! Not only did ARRL get the BPL
stopped but got most of the money back from the FCCYour TAX dollars
back to a good cause LOL
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Col
9 matches
Mail list logo
