Re: [AMRadio] CQ CQ OK?

ronnie.hull wrote: > OMG! is that from W5OD? No way... > > Ronnie - W5SUM > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 05:43:02 -0600, Jim Wilhite wrote > >> Well, W5OD! Can you believe it. At least there must be >> electricity at his QTH. His computer works! What about a >> transmitter and receiver Tony? >> >

Re: [AMRadio] CQ CQ OK?

OMG! is that from W5OD? No way... Ronnie - W5SUM On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 05:43:02 -0600, Jim Wilhite wrote > Well, W5OD! Can you believe it. At least there must be > electricity at his QTH. His computer works! What about a > transmitter and receiver Tony? > > We miss you bub. > > Jim > W5JO >

Re: [AMRadio] CQ CQ OK?

Well, W5OD! Can you believe it. At least there must be electricity at his QTH. His computer works! What about a transmitter and receiver Tony? We miss you bub. Jim W5JO > Gary your TEST failed as it only awoke W5JO... who can > fall asleep > in a Roundtable then pick up the conversati

[AMRadio] CQ CQ OK?

Gary your TEST failed as it only awoke W5JO... who can fall asleep in a Roundtable then pick up the conversation months after the QSO.. Hi Jim, ;-) 73, From The Gulf Coast, Tony/W5OD ___ Amradio mailing list List Home: http://w5ami.net/mailman/li